We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Royal
Details
Submitted by[?]: Royal Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2749
Description[?]:
| ... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on nuclear power.
Old value:: The decision is left up to local governments.
Current: The government encourages nuclear power (subsidies, tax relief etc).
Proposed: The government does not take any position on nuclear power.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:24:28, May 01, 2009 CET | From | Royal Party | To | Debating the Royal |
| Message | This bill was to have been called "Royal Nuclear Amendment". |
| Date | 04:21:08, May 01, 2009 CET | From | Supporters of Science in Design (IP) | To | Debating the Royal |
| Message | This would take power away from the regional governments. We feel it is important for the regions to be able to determine whether or not to allow for or to oppose nuclear power, so as to allow them to shape their futures. -Kaily Kho, SSD Candidate for Governor General in 2755 |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes |
Total Seats: 28 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 47 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363 |
| Random quote: "The theory of Communism may be summed up in the single sentence: abolition of private property." - Karl Marx |