We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Act of Settlement 2750
Details
Submitted by[?]: Rutanian Elitist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2751
Description[?]:
The REP proposes the following bill: Article 1: An office of Vice-President shall be created in the Commonwealth of Rutania Article 2: The Vice-President is the lieutenant of the President. The Vice-President is nominated by the President and its mandate ends at the same time as the mandate of the President. A Vice-President once nominated cannot be revoked until the end of its mandate. Article 3: The Vice-President has executive function and togheter with the President represents Rutania as a state. The Vice-President is subordinated to the President and can act in the field of foreign politics, defence at the request or order of the President. Article 4: The Vice-President cannot be member of the same party as the President. The only exception is when a party controls 2/3 or more of the parliamentary seats. Article 5: This bill can be ammended or abolished only by 2/3s of the MPs. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 19:43:02, May 02, 2009 CET | From | Popular Socialist Liberation Movement | To | Debating the Act of Settlement 2750 |
Message | We can't see any real need in Vice Presidential office in Rutania, but, on another hand, we don't think that this bill will have any negative consequences. |
Date | 20:00:49, May 02, 2009 CET | From | Rutanian Restoration Party | To | Debating the Act of Settlement 2750 |
Message | We will support this proposal. It will open up avenues for more cooperation in government. |
Date | 20:36:33, May 02, 2009 CET | From | Rutanian Elitist Party | To | Debating the Act of Settlement 2750 |
Message | Response to the PSLM: This measeure would increase the prepresentation of the people within the Presidential Office of Rutania, given the fact that two parties would have acces to this institiution. |
Date | 09:07:38, May 03, 2009 CET | From | Rutanian Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Act of Settlement 2750 |
Message | REP -- Explain why the VP cannot be from the same party? Whats the point of this? And, how can this legislation help the people of Rutania the most? |
Date | 09:53:30, May 03, 2009 CET | From | Rutanian Heritage Party | To | Debating the Act of Settlement 2750 |
Message | We can support this. |
Date | 10:11:30, May 03, 2009 CET | From | Rutanian Elitist Party | To | Debating the Act of Settlement 2750 |
Message | Response to the RSDP: If the President and the Vice-President are from the same party, then there is really no point in creating the office. But if they have to be from different parties, the fact has many advantages: - encourages cooperation among the parties - offers better representation of the citizens - the major decisions are not monopolized by one party. I think in this way I answerd to the last question as well. |
Date | 14:39:08, May 03, 2009 CET | From | Rutanian Heritage Party | To | Debating the Act of Settlement 2750 |
Message | As the party in Rutania with the greatest number of seats in parliament and the greatest number of votes in the last few elections, the 'RHP' believe that it is only reasonable that the vice president be a member of our party, though under this legislation, that would of course be left to the president's discretion. We would also take this as a gesture of good-will and friendship, and a step towards reconciling the recent differences between our party and the 'REP' over the issue of 'Nova Terra'. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 295 | ||||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Particracy allows you to establish an unelected head of state like a monarch or a president-for-life, but doing this is a bit of a process. First elect a candidate with the name "." to the Head of State position. Then change your law on the "Structure of the executive branch" to "The head of state is hereditary and symbolic; the head of government chairs the cabinet" and change the "formal title of the head of state" to how you want the new head of state's title and name to appear (eg. King Percy XVI). |
Random quote: "Law is mind without reason." - Aristotle |