We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Federal judicial review act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Individualism Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2752
Description[?]:
| In order to standardize the legal system it should be possible to appeal state-level decisions in a national court for certain judicial matters where a need for standardization across the country is desirable. It will also increase a potentially innocent defendant's options in case of judicial mistakes, and allows them more chances to receive a fair trial |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's position towards the administration of law.
Old value:: There are regional courts that have jurisdiction over questions of regional law and national courts that have jurisdiction over questions of national law.
Current: There are regional courts that have jurisdiction over questions of regional law and national courts that have jurisdiction over questions of national law.
Proposed: There are regional courts, but decisions of regional courts may be appealed to national courts (if the right to appeal exists).
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 216 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 188 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 97 |
| Random fact: In general, role-play requires the consent of all players. |
| Random quote: "The substance of the eminent Socialist gentlemen's speech is that making a profit is a sin. It is my belief that the real sin is taking a loss!" - Winston Churchill |