Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5475
Next month in: 00:47:41
Server time: 19:12:18, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): HopesFor | LC73DunMHP | Paulo Nogueira | RogueALD | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Renaming Lodamun

Details

Submitted by[?]: Slaytanic Wehrmacht

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2129

Description[?]:

We hereby demand to rename the "Five Nations of Lodamun" to "The Five Unholy Nations of the Lodamun Empire". No further explanation needed.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date10:21:09, October 18, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Renaming Lodamun
MessageWe would prefer if "Satanic" was left out of the name. "Unholy" and "Empire" are fine with us though.

Date14:44:08, October 18, 2005 CET
FromSlaytanic Wehrmacht
ToDebating the Renaming Lodamun
MessageUnholy Empire of Lodamun would be a temporary compromise we could live with.

Date18:38:39, October 18, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Renaming Lodamun
MessageWould you consider Five Unholy Nations of Lodamun? Just curious.

Date18:54:38, October 18, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Renaming Lodamun
MessageWhat about "mostly unholy"?

Some of the regions are becoming more pure every day now.

Date19:06:23, October 18, 2005 CET
From National People's Gang
ToDebating the Renaming Lodamun
MessageCan we include a "The"?

How about "The Five Unholy Nations of Empirical Lodamun"?

It retains the suggestion of "empire" and also explains the "Unholy".

Date19:21:00, October 18, 2005 CET
FromSlaytanic Wehrmacht
ToDebating the Renaming Lodamun
MessageThe Five Mostly Unholy Nations of Empirical Lodamun?

Date21:56:26, October 18, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Renaming Lodamun
MessageThe Five Nations, of Varying Degrees of Holiness and Unholiness, of Lodamun?

Date22:45:15, October 18, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Renaming Lodamun
MessageWe could always add "probably"

"The Five Empirical Nations of Lodamun of Probably Unholiness"

Date22:46:48, October 18, 2005 CET
From Freedom Party
ToDebating the Renaming Lodamun
MessageThe Five Unholy Nations of the Lodamun Empire

Date22:48:33, October 18, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Renaming Lodamun
Message*of Probable Unholiness

Date23:46:27, October 18, 2005 CET
From Freedom Party
ToDebating the Renaming Lodamun
MessageThe Five Unholy Nations of the Lodamun Empire

Date00:33:53, October 19, 2005 CET
FromCNT/AFL
ToDebating the Renaming Lodamun
MessageThe Five Nations of varying degrees of probably unholiness of the Lodamunian and North Seleyan Empire.

Date01:36:17, October 19, 2005 CET
From National People's Gang
ToDebating the Renaming Lodamun
MessageThe Improbability Factor of Five Unholy Nations Possibly Within Empirical Lodamun ( Turn Left at the North Seleyan Drift, It's On The Corner, You Can'r Miss It Guv)

Date19:22:02, October 19, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Renaming Lodamun
MessageThere are five books, which are probably unholy but the degree to whcih they are unholy may vary from book to book, and could you take those books back to the library, or private book dealer if the increasingly unholy parties making up the assembly get their way, empirical fact being of little consequence when it comes to people who declare things variously holy or unholy, what were we talking about, oh yeah, of Lodamun.

Date01:25:53, October 20, 2005 CET
From National People's Gang
ToDebating the Renaming Lodamun
Messageholy schmolie...
all this and philosophy too.

Date10:54:44, October 21, 2005 CET
FromSlaytanic Wehrmacht
ToDebating the Renaming Lodamun
Messageok i proposed the compromise freedom party came up with. Let's see if this gets a majority :)

Date17:43:22, October 21, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Renaming Lodamun
Messagenot a chance, if we're being serious.

Date18:28:07, October 21, 2005 CET
From National People's Gang
ToDebating the Renaming Lodamun
MessageThe Freedom Party has nothing to do with Lodamun, apart from somehow having a key to the backdoor.

Date00:58:49, October 22, 2005 CET
FromDemocractic Socialist Party of Lodamun
ToDebating the Renaming Lodamun
MessageThis nation is neither unholy nor an empire.

We want a name to represent the citizens.

Opposed.

Date05:18:10, October 22, 2005 CET
FromCNT/AFL
ToDebating the Renaming Lodamun
MessageIt's either "There are five books, which are probably unholy but the degree to whcih they are unholy may vary from book to book, and could you take those books back to the library, or private book dealer if the increasingly unholy parties making up the assembly get their way, empirical fact being of little consequence when it comes to people who declare things variously holy or unholy, what were we talking about, oh yeah, of Lodamun." or nothing!

Date05:43:52, October 22, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Renaming Lodamun
MessageWe can agree to that

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 109

no
     

Total Seats: 164

abstain
 

Total Seats: 27


Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, it is the responsibility of players to ensure the candidate boxes on their Party Overview screens are filled in with appropriate names. If a player is allotted seats in a Cabinet bill and has not filled in names for the relevant candidate position, then the program will automatically fill in the positions with names which might not necessarily be appropriate for the Cultural Protocols.

Random quote: "I start with the premise that the function of leadership is to produce more leaders, not more followers." - Ralph Nader

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 87