We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: National Transport Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Labour Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2755
Description[?]:
| This bill proposes that government funded transport would be better managed on a national level as opposed to a local level, allowing better cohesion between regions in terms of traffic and infrastructure. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Funding of public transport (where applicable).
Old value:: Local governments decide upon the funding policy.
Current: Public transport is fully subsidised for people with low-income, with the remainder "user-pays".
Proposed: Public transport is fully subsidised by the government.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:39:31, May 11, 2009 CET | From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the National Transport Bill |
| Message | This might be true, were the transportation minister a proper Zogist. As it is we must strip the present "government" of all power and authority in order to reduce the extent of malfeasance and larceny. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 419 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 331 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
| Random quote: "While we may not always agree it is my hope that we may always be civil." - Jonathan Clarke, former Hutorian politician |