Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5461
Next month in: 00:10:55
Server time: 11:49:04, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): SocDemDundorfian | Temitayo | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Religious Neutrality Bill of 2755

Details

Submitted by[?]: People's Party - Republican Democrats

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2756

Description[?]:

We believe that all public officials should refrain from displaying their religious allegiance while exercising their duties, as such demonstrations compromise the religious neutrality of the public institutions these officials are representing.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date09:14:14, May 13, 2009 CET
FromGreen Party of Aldegar
ToDebating the Religious Neutrality Bill of 2755
MessageThe neutrality of public services is only to be achieved through the universal acceptance that religion is a matter for the individual, not for the state or even other people to interfere.

Date09:24:15, May 13, 2009 CET
FromPeople's Party - Republican Democrats
ToDebating the Religious Neutrality Bill of 2755
MessageAnd that's why we believe that public officials should refrain from demonstrating their religious allegiance while exercising their duties. What they do in their own time is of no interest to the public, but flaunting their religion into the faces of the members of the members of the public, who may be of a different religious persuasion and whom public officials are supposed to serve, compromises the religious neutrality of our public institutions.

Date14:19:54, May 13, 2009 CET
FromGreen Party of Aldegar
ToDebating the Religious Neutrality Bill of 2755
MessageWhat a person wears is not the problem. The problem is how others react to it. If someone is offended because he sees someone wearing a shirt with his (the see-er) name, do we tell the wearer to change his shirt? And don't say religion is different, because by acknowledging that it is, you are stepping away from being a secular party.

Date15:48:40, May 13, 2009 CET
FromPeople's Party - Republican Democrats
ToDebating the Religious Neutrality Bill of 2755
MessageWhat a person wears when exercising a public function can be a problem. Many religions do implicitely maintain that they are the only true religion. Which can be offensive for members of other religions (and agnostics and atheists, for that matter). When public officials perform their public duties, which they are paid for by the public and which they are exercising in the name of the whole public, they should refrain from bringing their private beliefs into these affairs. And the wearing of religious symbols is a statement of private beliefs which is potentially offensive for members of the public.

Date16:49:04, May 14, 2009 CET
FromGreen Party of Aldegar
ToDebating the Religious Neutrality Bill of 2755
MessageAs long as they are not preaching and forcing people to join specific beliefs, hey are not bringing their private beliefs into public affairs. You, on the other hand, are preaching and forcing secularism, instead of promoting an open-minded society where every religious, and non-religious, expression (amongst others) are embraced.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 172

no
    

Total Seats: 327

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Particracy is completely free! If you want to support the game financially, feel free to make a small donation to the lievenswouter@gmail.com Paypal account.

    Random quote: "The key to understanding the American system is to imagine that you have the power to make nearly any law you want, but your worst enemy will be the one to enforce it." - Rick Cook

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 51