We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Declaration of the Rights of Man
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Liberal Alliance
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2129
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the Declaration of the Rights of Man. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Declaration of the Rights of Man.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:42:54, October 18, 2005 CET | From | United Liberal Alliance | To | Debating the Ratification of the Declaration of the Rights of Man |
| Message | Thought we should debate ratifying the Rights of Man!! |
| Date | 21:05:10, October 18, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Ratification of the Declaration of the Rights of Man |
| Message | Looks fine, i'll support it. |
| Date | 05:12:28, October 19, 2005 CET | From | Rationalist Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Declaration of the Rights of Man |
| Message | We disagree with several points stated in this, and would disagree anyway because this agreement lacks any teeth at all. It is a meaningless document, unable to either force change or prevent oppression. |
| Date | 09:20:38, October 19, 2005 CET | From | United Liberal Alliance | To | Debating the Ratification of the Declaration of the Rights of Man |
| Message | RP: Which points do you disagree with and why? I can see very little to disagree with other than the fact that as you say it is just a statement of principles with nothing enforced |
| Date | 09:55:40, October 19, 2005 CET | From | Anti-Ownership Federation Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Declaration of the Rights of Man |
| Message | I just don't think this would change anything we haven't already established.... |
| Date | 11:35:26, October 19, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Ratification of the Declaration of the Rights of Man |
| Message | isnt it weird that it never mentions women. I can understand if you only use man, as an example for humans, but nultiple times it refores to "men", meaning the male sex, but never women, so i will vote no on this sexist proposal |
| Date | 19:20:22, October 19, 2005 CET | From | United Liberal Alliance | To | Debating the Ratification of the Declaration of the Rights of Man |
| Message | Granted, perhaps the original document should have been modified for Particracy purposes but i can still see no reason not to ratify it |
| Date | 21:54:28, October 19, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Ratification of the Declaration of the Rights of Man |
| Message | Many times when i write an article or essay myself, when using examples i also use "he", "him" "males" it's mostly a reaction.... We can easily petition to get him to ratify it to be gender neutral. There should be no problems. |
| Date | 19:04:19, October 21, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Ratification of the Declaration of the Rights of Man |
| Message | Why are you against it TNP? It can't be the grammar can it? |
| Date | 23:44:42, October 21, 2005 CET | From | Telamon National Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Declaration of the Rights of Man |
| Message | I dont see the point in these types of bills that have no effect on the gameplay what so ever. |
| Date | 00:53:50, October 22, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Ratification of the Declaration of the Rights of Man |
| Message | i dont see the point |
| Date | 13:42:30, October 22, 2005 CET | From | United Liberal Alliance | To | Debating the Ratification of the Declaration of the Rights of Man |
| Message | That's not a reason to vote no |
| Date | 13:43:13, October 22, 2005 CET | From | United Liberal Alliance | To | Debating the Ratification of the Declaration of the Rights of Man |
| Message | You were happy to ratify the Makon Continental Friendship Treaty although that didn't really have any effect on gameplay |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 103 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 133 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 19 |
| Random fact: The grey space in the east is populated by the forum-based countries, known in-game as the former colonies or the "Third World". These countries are managed by the Third World Coordinator but players can request control of individual countries in the Third World Control Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=8302 |
| Random quote: "My tenure will be controversial and it is, quite obviously, true that I am the most right-wing Prime Minister this country has seen in several decades.” - Margaret Woodhall, former Dranian politician |