We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: New Coalition
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Imperial Hobrazian Front
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2759
Description[?]:
| Let's rock. |
Proposals
Article 1
As per the Constitution, the Hobratsis Respublikis Prezidenti (President of the Hobrazian Republic) chairs the cabinet.
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the First Party Of Hobrazia
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the K'avshiri rk'ina
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the K'avshiri rk'ina
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the National Imperial Hobrazian Front
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the First Party Of Hobrazia
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the National Imperial Hobrazian Front
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the United Republics Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the K'avshiri rk'ina
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the United Republics Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the First Party Of Hobrazia
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the National Imperial Hobrazian Front
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the United Republics Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:47:06, May 20, 2009 CET | From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the New Coalition |
| Message | I support this cabinet somewhat. As Finance Minister, I promise to restore fiscal sanity. Also, I suggest a bill nominating a new ambassador to the UNT as this cabinet does not include this. I'm not in favor of the First Party hold that post however given the actions of its former UNT ambassador (refusing to yield his post and return to Hobrazia as required by law). |
| Date | 15:47:40, May 20, 2009 CET | From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the New Coalition |
| Message | *holding |
| Date | 18:26:56, May 20, 2009 CET | From | First Party Of Hobrazia | To | Debating the New Coalition |
| Message | We refute such claims, we would never expect a member of a party to return to a nation that would arrest and at that time probably have executed him. The former ambassador did not refuse to leave his position the UNT without him decided that he should remain, he had no involvement in that at all. For the ambassador to the UNT we would again nominate Nico Neesam given his diplomatic credentials. |
| Date | 23:45:39, May 20, 2009 CET | From | Partido Popular | To | Debating the New Coalition |
| Message | The former ambassador to the UNT, by leaving Hobrazia, forfeited any claim he may have had of representing the Hobrazian government. |
| Date | 02:08:40, May 21, 2009 CET | From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the New Coalition |
| Message | I agree with Partido Popular on this one. The former ambassador is a traitor acting against laws passed by the Imperium Congress at worst and a coward at best. Nico Neesam could learn something from Victoria Diggory who bravely stood against the old regime and was imprisoned. The URP may be an insignificant party, but its ten votes are pretty important when the current majority holds a slim one vote lead. United Republicans vote their conscience and remain loyal to their beliefs above temporary political coalitions. I remind the Emperor that the URP cast the critical votes defeating the Nova Terran Unification Treaty and walked away from the "Fair Deal" that granted it complete power over Stormridge as a result. The URP will simply not vote for Nico Neesam. Political oppression in Lodamun led the United Republics Party to flee Lodamun - the same country that granted Mr. Neesam refuge. While Lodamun remains a well known anti-democratic regime that has blockaded international waters in violation of international law and threatened Hobrazian interests worldwide, Mr. Neesam could only concern himself with holding on to his own UNT post and protecting his own butt. Given the anti-Lodamese (Liberal Party) sentiment of my party, I would never support an ambassador beholden to that corrupt foreign regime. Why would I when I have confidence that the current CSD ambassador would continue to oppose Lodamese dominance in the UNT (even if not proactively). |
| Date | 02:09:28, May 21, 2009 CET | From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the New Coalition |
| Message | *correction I have 16 votes now |
| Date | 17:41:46, May 21, 2009 CET | From | First Party Of Hobrazia | To | Debating the New Coalition |
| Message | We are not surprise by this stance against our candidate, he was dislikedfrom the outset by the former terrorist parties. How dare the URP accuse us of not standing up for the people, we need not remind them that many members of our party were persecuted and killed following bills they helped to pass. We were alone at one stage fighting for the rights of liberty and justice. Nico Neesam served honourably as ambassador to the UNT. He carried out his duty. There is no evidence that he tried to cling to office. There isnothing he said on that regard, when removed by the terrorist government he was granted assylum as a death sentence hung over his head, what would be the point in returning to face a needless death, what would that serve, nothing. Nico Neesam never fought to stay ambassador, he simply did not speak once deselected, he did not even speak when the UNT discussed who should be ambassador, he accepted the fact. We will back our candidate and using threatening talk such as bringing down the government shows no loyality to anyone but yourselves. The UNT ambassador is not a tool to simple oppose your mindset that Lodamun is evil and dominant, it is to defend Hobrazian interest in Terra, to defend the people of this nation not your political ideology. ***First party members chant Nico Neesam for Ambassador*** |
| Date | 00:06:14, May 22, 2009 CET | From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the New Coalition |
| Message | Chant away. Pointless chatter will not change our position that Neesam is indebted to a corrupt foreign regime. The URP will not vote for him. |
| Date | 00:15:31, May 22, 2009 CET | From | We Say So! Party | To | Debating the New Coalition |
| Message | Might we suggest a more neutral Party take the position? As it would be unlikely that the URP would support a WSS!P representative, although such a member would likely do a sterling job, we would like to suggest that the CSP put forward a representative to speak for the UNT. |
| Date | 00:27:26, May 22, 2009 CET | From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the New Coalition |
| Message | I'd agree to a CSP ambassador. |
| Date | 17:48:08, May 22, 2009 CET | From | First Party Of Hobrazia | To | Debating the New Coalition |
| Message | We can agree to a CSP ambassador |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 201 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 199 |
| Random fact: The use of proxy servers makes it impossible to detect multiing and is therefore forbidden. Players who access Particracy through a proxy will have their accounts inactivated. |
| Random quote: "I think the environment should be put in the category of our national security. Defense of our resources is just as important as defense abroad. Otherwise, what is there to defend?" - Robert Redford |