Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5470
Next month in: 00:55:44
Server time: 19:04:15, April 16, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): ADM Drax | R Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the United Nations of Terra

Details

Submitted by[?]: H+ Paradigm

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2762

Description[?]:

This bill asks for the ratification of the United Nations of Terra. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:21:29, May 20, 2009 CET
FromH+ Paradigm
ToDebating the Ratification of the United Nations of Terra
MessageOpinions?

Date21:51:58, May 20, 2009 CET
FromLiberal Coalition of Kazulia
ToDebating the Ratification of the United Nations of Terra
MessageIt seems like a good idea, but the national assembly have to pass some resolutions regarding the representation of our nation, should it be the prime minister, the minister of foreign affairs or a UN-ambassador elected among the electorate. Should the parliament discuss the issues that are up for debate in the UN or shall the ambassador have carte blanc to represent the nations interest

Date03:37:35, May 21, 2009 CET
FromH+ Paradigm
ToDebating the Ratification of the United Nations of Terra
MessageI agree.

Representative: I would prefer it to be the FA minister or an elected ambassador. An elected ambassador would likely be best as the FA minister is busy with other things and wouldn't really be able to attend the UN meetings on the forums while performing his/her other tasks.

If we had a more active player base I'd say the Stortinget should debate everything but I doubt we'd be able to get input from everyone here quickly enough to participate effectively in the on-forum UN meetings. So, carte-blanche is the option I would prefer here.

Date11:00:40, May 21, 2009 CET
FromMitten Partiet
ToDebating the Ratification of the United Nations of Terra
MessageI would prefer an elected ambassador for a term of 10-15 years

Date22:40:25, May 26, 2009 CET
FromH+ Paradigm
ToDebating the Ratification of the United Nations of Terra
MessageI don't care who our ambassador is. As long as they are active and performs as directed by the govt. of Kazulia.

So, MP, tLCoK: pick one of you to be our ambassador.

The foreign ministry will expect to receive reports from the ambassador regarding UN discussions.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 59

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
     

    Total Seats: 16


    Random fact: Real-life places should not be referenced in Particracy.

    Random quote: "The secret of freedom lies in educating people, whereas the secret of tyranny is in keeping them ignorant." - Maximilien Robespierre

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 51