Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5475
Next month in: 02:51:01
Server time: 21:08:58, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): AethanKal | albaniansunited | dnobb | Klexi | Mbites2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Hoy nation for a holy state

Details

Submitted by[?]: Am Echad, Pays Libre

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2761

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:22:45, May 23, 2009 CET
FromBismarckian National Resistance (BNR)
ToDebating the Hoy nation for a holy state
MessageI understand the fact and agree that polygamous and homosexual marriages should not be considered marriages (at least religiously); however, I feel that the government should recognize those types of relationships as civil unions instead so that they still have the legal rights of married couples. If the CZP agrees we ask them to add this note to the description before opening this bill for voting.

Date04:08:32, May 23, 2009 CET
FromAm Echad, Pays Libre
ToDebating the Hoy nation for a holy state
MessageI tend to disagree with my fellow right-winger, i say nothing for them as sodomy is one of the major sins. No recognition for them at all.

Date05:49:51, May 23, 2009 CET
From Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party)
ToDebating the Hoy nation for a holy state
MessageWe are deeply upset by this act of CZP who continued to disregard the right of the whole population in favour of their biased belief. If this passed, Pontesi may be forces to take it up to the security council of the UNT.

Date06:09:34, May 23, 2009 CET
FromAm Echad, Pays Libre
ToDebating the Hoy nation for a holy state
MessageWe are allowed to pass laws in our nation that go along with the majority of our nation.

Date09:34:28, May 23, 2009 CET
From Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party)
ToDebating the Hoy nation for a holy state
MessagePerhaps, but democracy isn't about only following the will of the majority. It's also about listening to the voice of minority. We will not tolerate such injustice aganist Pntek people.

Date15:25:05, May 23, 2009 CET
FromTadrakian Military Regime
ToDebating the Hoy nation for a holy state
MessageWe request that this bill is pushed off until after the next elections, Then it will show who still supports your party, and your religious views.

Date03:32:42, May 24, 2009 CET
FromBDSP un Beys fun Yisserles-Binyomen
ToDebating the Hoy nation for a holy state
MessageThat would be good.

Date04:58:52, May 24, 2009 CET
FromAm Echad, Pays Libre
ToDebating the Hoy nation for a holy state
MessageI would like the people to see who the real religious people are and who they aren't.

Date05:11:54, May 24, 2009 CET
FromBDSP un Beys fun Yisserles-Binyomen
ToDebating the Hoy nation for a holy state
MessageWe promote freedom and religion.

Date08:55:32, May 24, 2009 CET
FromKnesset Yeshua
ToDebating the Hoy nation for a holy state
MessageI applaud you notzri tzionut!
Baruch Atta Adonai, Elohei Beiteynu

Date09:06:04, May 24, 2009 CET
FromBDSP un Beys fun Yisserles-Binyomen
ToDebating the Hoy nation for a holy state
MessageI propose we formally invite Pontesi to invade.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 75

no
 

Total Seats: 81

abstain
  

Total Seats: 44


Random fact: Before choosing a nation, you may wish to research it first. For more information on the cultural backgrounds of the nations, please see the Cultural Protocols Index: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6365

Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia)

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 82