We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Private Property Respect Act of 2762
Details
Submitted by[?]: Green Party of Aldegar
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2762
Description[?]:
| . |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Current: The government may seize private property for vital government works and for corporate use.
Proposed: The government may not seize private property.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:32:59, May 26, 2009 CET | From | People's Party - Republican Democrats | To | Debating the Private Property Respect Act of 2762 |
| Message | As there are adequate provisions for compensation in force, we see no reason why the appropriation of private property for vital works should not be possible. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 107 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 287 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 105 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
| Random quote: "We never know the worth of water 'til the well is dry." - Thomas Fuller |