Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5474
Next month in: 01:33:10
Server time: 10:26:49, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): rezins | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Religion Reforms Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Anti-Ownership Federation Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2129

Description[?]:

There shall be no religious schools.......

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date10:12:04, October 19, 2005 CET
FromAnti-Ownership Federation Party
ToDebating the Religion Reforms Act
MessageWe should give children a secular education, and let them decide for themselves, whether to take up a faith in later life.

Date10:13:31, October 19, 2005 CET
FromAnti-Ownership Federation Party
ToDebating the Religion Reforms Act
Messageor hopefully keep a clear view of life.... (no offence meant to anyone)

Date19:19:13, October 19, 2005 CET
FromUnited Liberal Alliance
ToDebating the Religion Reforms Act
MessageNo, religous schools should be allowed - people should have the option for what sort of education they want

Date21:52:15, October 19, 2005 CET
FromConservative Party of Telamon
ToDebating the Religion Reforms Act
MessageChildren do whatever their parents tell them to do for the most part....when they are adults (16) they can make the decision how to continue their higher education and their faith.

I see nothing wrong.

Plus he'll learn a little more history, culture and maybe even more 'righteous' to say the least.

Date22:48:35, October 19, 2005 CET
FromRationalist Party
ToDebating the Religion Reforms Act
MessageWhile I did not go to a religious school, and would not send my children to one, there is no way that I would agree that they should be banned.

Date08:48:52, October 20, 2005 CET
FromAnti-Ownership Federation Party
ToDebating the Religion Reforms Act
MessageCP is right, parents force children into religion... they should be allowed to choose

Date09:47:37, October 20, 2005 CET
FromTelemon Lutheran Party
ToDebating the Religion Reforms Act
MessageHow are they supposed to chose without being educated about religion. And what about the children who are religious, should they not have the opportunity or a religious education?

Date10:22:24, October 20, 2005 CET
FromAnti-Ownership Federation Party
ToDebating the Religion Reforms Act
Messageunreligious schools can still educate about religion, they just wont concentrate on any specific one.....

Date19:04:30, October 20, 2005 CET
FromConservative Party of Telamon
ToDebating the Religion Reforms Act
MessageAOFP....thats history. Religious history.

I'm sorry you don't make a convincing argument at all, just getting rid of the peoples right to worship to a sane religion.

Date21:55:08, October 20, 2005 CET
From Federation Under Crazy Killers -- United
ToDebating the Religion Reforms Act
MessageWell at least I've found one thing about AOFP that I like. But in all fairness, we shouldnt ban religious schools. Just monitor them *VERY* closely.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 37

no
       

Total Seats: 218

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Moderation will not implement nation renaming requests where the proposed name does not comply with the requirements set out in the Nation Renaming Guide: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6364

    Random quote: "Nature provides a free lunch, but only if we control our appetites." - William Ruckelshaus

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 76