We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: DSP.500.2765
Details
Submitted by[?]: 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2766
Description[?]:
| Positioning. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning adoption.
Old value:: Adoption is not regulated.
Current: Adoption policy is to be established by local governments.
Proposed: Adoption is illegal.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy with respect to adultery.
Old value:: Adultery is legal.
Current: Adultery is legal.
Proposed: Adultery is a capital offence.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the initiation of divorces (if allowed).
Old value:: Either partner may initiate a divorce.
Current: Either partner may initiate a divorce.
Proposed: Only female partners may initiate a divorce.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The legality of interracial sex.
Old value:: Interracial sex is legal.
Current: Interracial sex is legal.
Proposed: Interracial sex is completely illegal.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy with respect to polygamy.
Old value:: Polygamous marriages are accorded equal recognition to monogamous marriages.
Current: Polygamous marriages are accorded equal recognition to monogamous marriages.
Proposed: The government does not recognise polygamous relationships and prosecute those who pursue a polygamous lifestyle.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:16:26, June 03, 2009 CET | From | Mugenkai | To | Debating the DSP.500.2765 |
| Message | OOC: So is it considered normal here to propose bills you oppose and vote against them? |
| Date | 23:19:57, June 03, 2009 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the DSP.500.2765 |
| Message | OOC: Well it depends, usually no, though in cases like this where we simply have had so few actual bills being voted on for so long that our collective visibility and positioning is screwed up, yes. |
| Date | 00:24:04, June 05, 2009 CET | From | Mugenkai | To | Debating the DSP.500.2765 |
| Message | OOC: Thanks for clarifying. Makes sense. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 476 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 124 |
| Random fact: Don't vote yes on a cabinet coalition that doesn't give you the power that you deserve. |
| Random quote: "Suburbia is where the developer bulldozes out the trees, then names the streets after them." - Bill Vaughn |