We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Representation Act 2128
Details
Submitted by[?]: Totalitarian Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2130
Description[?]:
Our great nation has been growing, and with it, so must our legislature. The Totalitarian Party proposes the seats in the legislative assembly be increased from 405 to 419, as per the legislation agreed upon in the Representation Act[1], http://82.238.75.178:8085/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=5607 |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The total number of seats in the legislative assembly. Should be between 75 and 750.
Old value:: 405
Current: 256
Proposed: 419
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:21:59, October 21, 2005 CET | From | Totalitarian Party | To | Debating the Representation Act 2128 |
Message | No comments? Is everyone happy with the original Representation Act? The number of seats I have proposed? |
Date | 07:23:55, October 22, 2005 CET | From | Anarcho-Capitalist Front | To | Debating the Representation Act 2128 |
Message | I have no preference either way. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 367 | ||||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
Random quote: "Up against the corporate government, voters find themselves asked to choose between look-alike candidates from two parties vying to see who takes the marching orders from their campaign paymasters and their future employers. The money of vested interest nullifies genuine voter choice and trust." - Ralph Nader |