We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Forest Management Act 2771
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2772
Description[?]:
Issue: Forrest Management. Current Policy:Local governments may set up forestry agencies. Where they do not, forestry is on a commercial basis. Proposed Policy: Local governments are required to operate forestry agencies, which own and manage all forest land. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: Local governments may set up forestry agencies. Where they do not, forestry is on a commercial basis.
Current: Local governments are required to operate forestry agencies, which own and manage all forest land.
Proposed: Local governments are required to operate forestry agencies, which own and manage all forest land.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 10:15:17, June 15, 2009 CET | From | People's Socialist Front of Aloria | To | Debating the Forest Management Act 2771 |
Message | We do not support local governments operating these forests. |
Date | 10:19:08, June 15, 2009 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Forest Management Act 2771 |
Message | Local governments are best placed to manage forrests, as opossed to national governments who may not know the local area or the impacts of certain operations that local governments with local knowledge would do. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 251 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 81 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 168 |
Random fact: Real life-life nationalities, cultures or ethnicities should not be referenced in Particracy (eg. "German"). |
Random quote: "And what is Aleppo?" - Gary Johnson |