We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Animali in via d'estinzione PSCdI
Details
Submitted by[?]: Rifondazione Social-Comunista
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2773
Description[?]:
Crediamo ancora che non sia giusto portare via dal loro habitat gli animali in via d'estinzione per rinchiuderli in uno zoo per il resto della loro vita. Non la riteniamo nemmeno la condizione migliore per preservarli dall'estinzione. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the keeping of endangered animals.
Old value:: Only zoos or zoological institutions are allowed to keep endangered animals; all other forms of keeping or trading in endangered animals are forbidden.
Current: Only zoos or zoological institutions are allowed to keep endangered animals; all other forms of keeping or trading in endangered animals are forbidden.
Proposed: Keeping endangered animals, or trading therein, is forbidden.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 13:10:00, June 17, 2009 CET | From | Partito Borisista Istaliano - S.I. | To | Debating the Animali in via d'estinzione PSCdI |
Message | Riteniamo invece che tenere alcuni esemplari (in numero limitato) possa comunque aiutare a preservare la psecie nel caso il loro habitat sia pesantemente minacciato. |
Date | 20:36:22, June 17, 2009 CET | From | Rifondazione Social-Comunista | To | Debating the Animali in via d'estinzione PSCdI |
Message | Riteniamo che quella descritta dal PBI sia una soluzione temporanea da attuare in determinate situazioni, non ci pare sufficiente per giustificare la cattività di un numero illimitato di esempleri protetti. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 181 | ||
no | Total Seats: 262 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 156 |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
Random quote: "A prince never lacks legitimate reasons to break his promise." - Niccolo Machiavelli |