Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5472
Next month in: 03:57:57
Server time: 00:02:02, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): DanivonX | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of October 2784

Details

Submitted by[?]: The Liberal Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2785

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

This unity government will provide the necessary framework for prosperity in our country. We encourage all of the parties included to vote in the affirmative.

The Liberal Party is willing to compromise on certain cabinet posts that any party may be interested in. However, we should pass this first and then re-negotiate to better suit everyone's desires.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:25:55, July 11, 2009 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2784
MessageUnity Government? What unity? The LP continues to propose cabinets with the least number of seats possible. When the KF was here the CDR was not included in this unity. i wonder why it would leave a current inclusive cabinet for one led by a party that seized CDR lands in direct violation of law?

Date12:41:13, July 11, 2009 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2784
MessageA majority is a majority whether the URP likes it or not. At least, we include the CDR unlike you. For your information, we had nothing to do with the disputed lands.

Date22:33:23, July 11, 2009 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2784
MessageI included the CDR, but it abstained bc he was inactive. My next proposal excluded the CDR, but I made it clear that it would be welcome in the future. Stop inventing and twisting your own facts.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 65

no
  

Total Seats: 74

abstain
 

Total Seats: 18


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "You don't have to be straight to be in the military; you just have to be able to shoot straight." - Barry Goldwater

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 59