Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5471
Next month in: 01:12:14
Server time: 14:47:45, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Dx6743 | JVTA | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Military

Details

Submitted by[?]: Party of the Pro-Kalopian Dynasty

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2792

Description[?]:

Although we would like to add more to this bill, we understand for in order to get it passed, we must comply, and leave out a few extra sections that we would prefer in the bill, for our Communist leaders to pass this bill. We hope that we've made everything reasonable.

Pantaleon Zopyros, Head of the PPKD

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:48:27, July 26, 2009 CET
FromCommunist Party of Kafuristan
ToDebating the Military
MessageOppose 3, 4, and 1 a little bit, and are ok with 2. We will have to consider this.

Date01:53:08, July 26, 2009 CET
FromParty of the Pro-Kalopian Dynasty
ToDebating the Military
MessageWell, since I haven't put this to vote, maybe you can tell use the issues you have with these proposals, and we may be able to work out a compromise?

Date01:56:01, July 26, 2009 CET
FromCommunist Party of Kafuristan
ToDebating the Military
MessageArticle 1 we feel is uncessary, but we are not particularly opposed to it. However, we do not want any restrictions on whether the people's government can sell arms or use nuclear weapons. If we feel it necessary to use tactical nuclear weapons to gain an advantage on the battlefield, we wish to do that. In a revelutionary war, for the survival of the people and the nation, there can be no rules like this. Arms exports to close allies of the people should not be ruled out either, and the sexism in article 5 goes against our socialist values of the equality of all human beings. Ie, if you just left 1 and 2, we would support.

Date02:08:03, July 26, 2009 CET
FromParty of the Pro-Kalopian Dynasty
ToDebating the Military
MessageWell why kill civilians in the nation for no reason? Unless we can't win otherwise, I see no point.

Well, if we fix Article 4 to make it say that arms can only be exported to close Allies, would that be okay?

And we shouldn't be killing our mothers out in the battlefield. If they help medically, help with supplies, etc., that's seems fine.

Date02:09:18, July 26, 2009 CET
FromCommunist Party of Kafuristan
ToDebating the Military
MessageWe cannot support sexism in the army, and we will not support your party trying to tell the people's army what weapons it can use. Be careful sir, sexism and cowardice do not go down well in this party...

Date02:16:31, July 26, 2009 CET
FromParty of the Pro-Kalopian Dynasty
ToDebating the Military
MessageSo how about this:

We keep the first two articles.

Three and 5 are removed.

And we switch four to the article in my above post.

Would you support it?

Date02:24:07, July 26, 2009 CET
FromCommunist Party of Kafuristan
ToDebating the Military
MessageYes, then that is acceptable.

Date02:37:42, July 26, 2009 CET
FromParty of the Pro-Kalopian Dynasty
ToDebating the Military
MessageOkay. I'll put it to vote then.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 356

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
     

    Total Seats: 99


    Random fact: Players are expected to play the game independently and should not share their passwords or allow others to access their accounts.

    Random quote: "Freedom is not America's gift to the world. It is God's gift to humanity. " - George W. Bush

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 64