Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5471
Next month in: 03:59:17
Server time: 08:00:42, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): albaniansunited | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Neutrality Act of 2795

Details

Submitted by[?]: Kolonial Partei

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2795

Description[?]:

Basic non interventionist bill.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:44:38, July 31, 2009 CET
FromKonstitutionelle Monarchie Partei
ToDebating the Neutrality Act of 2795
MessageWe have a stable relationship with Vorona and I want it to keep it that way.

Date21:48:57, July 31, 2009 CET
FromKonstitutionelle Monarchie Partei
ToDebating the Neutrality Act of 2795
MessageThe National Party has failed to provide an explanation on why Hulstria should remove itself from this treaty and as a matter of fact, if the NP really wants "neutrality", why not just propose Hulstria remove itself from everything treaty we have that binds us to one organization or another? Why target this treaty that has worked perfectly?

Date23:06:41, July 31, 2009 CET
FromKolonial Partei
ToDebating the Neutrality Act of 2795
MessageWould the FAP prefer the NP propose we withdraw from all binding treaties? This was done as a moderate choice. Mutual defense pacts are inherently detrimental. We shouldn't drag ourselves into wars that do not concern us, friendly nation or not.

Date23:10:25, July 31, 2009 CET
FromSocialist Party of Greater Hulstria
ToDebating the Neutrality Act of 2795
MessageAfter consulting with the FAP, we have reversed our positions and shall vote nay.

Date01:46:37, August 01, 2009 CET
FromKonstitutionelle Monarchie Partei
ToDebating the Neutrality Act of 2795
MessageI have told the NP before when they tried to remove us from this treaty, there is an opt-out option where both nations can refuse to help for whatever reason. I don't know why the NP, who controls the Defense Ministry, is so opposed to a mutual defense pact.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 272

no
    

Total Seats: 453

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Players are expected to behave in a courteous, co-operative manner and make a reasonable effort to act with the consent of all players involved, even where the rules do not make consent strictly necessary. In particular, players have a responsibility to take reasonable care that other players are not misinformed either about the role-play or the Game Rules.

    Random quote: "Abolition of a woman's right to abortion, when and if she wants it, amounts to compulsory maternity: a form of rape by the State." - Edward Abbey

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 51