We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: More Freedom To The Citizens (internet)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Slaytanic Wehrmacht
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2130
Description[?]:
Our followers demand more liberties, they want to commit internet crimes without anyone persuing them. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Internet regulations.
Old value:: The government allows anyone to use the internet but the police can run investigations concerning illegal activities conducted by using internet (child abuse, illegal filesharing, ...)
Current: The government allows anyone to use the internet but the police can run investigations concerning illegal activities conducted by using internet (child abuse, illegal filesharing, ...)
Proposed: The government has no position on who may use or what is published on the internet.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 17:37:07, October 22, 2005 CET | From | CNT/AFL | To | Debating the More Freedom To The Citizens (internet) |
Message | Yes to 2,3 and 4, a split would be nice. |
Date | 17:53:10, October 22, 2005 CET | From | Cooperative Commonwealth Federation | To | Debating the More Freedom To The Citizens (internet) |
Message | The Greens wouold vote to deregulate the internet. Otherwise no. |
Date | 19:43:55, October 22, 2005 CET | From | Tuesday Is Coming | To | Debating the More Freedom To The Citizens (internet) |
Message | Opposed to all |
Date | 22:02:06, October 22, 2005 CET | From | Slaytanic Wehrmacht | To | Debating the More Freedom To The Citizens (internet) |
Message | ok split. |
Date | 14:17:32, October 23, 2005 CET | From | Slaytanic Wehrmacht | To | Debating the More Freedom To The Citizens (internet) |
Message | moving to a vote, as this bill can't be split any further, and there isn't much room for compromises between the current and the proposed value. |
Date | 19:50:07, October 23, 2005 CET | From | Cooperative Commonwealth Federation | To | Debating the More Freedom To The Citizens (internet) |
Message | "Yes" vote not to be construed as support for the bill description! |
Date | 20:12:04, October 23, 2005 CET | From | Tuesday Is Coming | To | Debating the More Freedom To The Citizens (internet) |
Message | why, the bill description is an exact replica of the bill proposal? |
Date | 22:14:27, October 23, 2005 CET | From | Cooperative Commonwealth Federation | To | Debating the More Freedom To The Citizens (internet) |
Message | Nah, we're supporting an internet free of government regulation, not a camapign of Satanist recruitment. Although we realize one will lead to the other. |
Date | 22:15:45, October 23, 2005 CET | From | Cooperative Commonwealth Federation | To | Debating the More Freedom To The Citizens (internet) |
Message | Is it jsut me display, or is the bill now WINNING 117-119? Shouldn't it be LOSING 119-117? |
Date | 22:24:49, October 23, 2005 CET | From | Tuesday Is Coming | To | Debating the More Freedom To The Citizens (internet) |
Message | It is losing, but due to minor distortions in the graphics, the yes side looks a bit larger. Consider: a party with 0 or 1 votes has a noticeable width, therefore all parties have something added to them. This stands out here because of the closeness of the vote and the fact that 4 parties support, while 2 oppose. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 117 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 156 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 27 |
Random fact: Check out the forum regularly for game news. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
Random quote: "What is conservatism? Is it not the adherence to the old and tried against the new and untried?" - Abraham Lincoln |