We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Animal Cruelty Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Anti-Ownership Federation Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2130
Description[?]:
| Animals should not be tested for any reason |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in cosmetics research.
Old value:: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is regulated.
Current: Animals may not be used for testing cosmetics products.
Proposed: Animals may not be used for testing cosmetics products.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:45:45, October 22, 2005 CET | From | United Liberal Alliance | To | Debating the Animal Cruelty Act |
| Message | I'm sorry but i don't agree with you there. You may have a point with regards to cosmetics but not with regards to medical research - do you propose that we test new drugs etc. on humans instead? |
| Date | 16:20:37, October 22, 2005 CET | From | Rationalist Party | To | Debating the Animal Cruelty Act |
| Message | #2 I disagree with, #1 I would support |
| Date | 21:06:34, October 22, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Animal Cruelty Act |
| Message | Agree with UCA, but nonetheless it is regulated. |
| Date | 03:26:40, October 23, 2005 CET | From | Anti-Ownership Federation Party | To | Debating the Animal Cruelty Act |
| Message | Re:#2.... yes i propose we test it on humans... why should we harm other species in our hunt for scientific development... i know you'll never agree with me on this....... |
| Date | 19:14:43, October 23, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Animal Cruelty Act |
| Message | Of course not...this is the most stupidest thing you've put to proposal so far. This will impair scientific development, as i assure you...much less people will sign up, for the newest medical wonder cure...which might kill them...they're not sure yet. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 152 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 103 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In cases where players introduce RP laws to a nation and then leave, Moderation reserves the discretion to declare the RP laws void if they appear to have fallen into disuse. In particular, please bear in mind that a player who is inexperienced with Particracy role-play and has joined a nation as the only party there should not generally be expected to abide by RP laws implemented by previous players who have been and left. |
| Random quote: "He who will not economize will have to agonize." - Confucius |