Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5471
Next month in: 00:07:09
Server time: 19:52:50, April 18, 2024 CET
Currently online (8): albaniansunited | Arusu-Gad | burgerboys | Dx6743 | HawkDun | hexaus18 | Mbites2 | R Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Religion Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: National Action Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2802

Description[?]:

This bill seeks to eliminate any influence of religion upon the government

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:51:05, August 13, 2009 CET
FromGreen Party of Aldegar
ToDebating the Religion Bill
MessageOk. A few questions:

1. How do foreign missionaries create religious influences on the government?
2. How do you suppose we separate religion from state when the state directly appoints ministers of religion?
3. How would making a stance on state religion separate religion from the state?

Date21:23:56, August 13, 2009 CET
FromNew Whig Party
ToDebating the Religion Bill
MessageAgree with all but 4. Too extreme for a yes.

Date22:26:16, August 13, 2009 CET
FromNational Action Party
ToDebating the Religion Bill
Message1) This is a parliamentary democracy, foreign missionaries can effect the peoples opinions. Therefor since the people can be influenced and the people have power, missionaries create influence.

2) Never did the NAP state it wished to separate religion from state. The NAP wishes to remove religions influence. If the ministers are appointed then they are puppets of the state and directly influenced by the state itself.

3) Having no stance does nothing to prevent influence. Proposal 5 would cut down on fringe influences on the people.

Date07:41:25, August 14, 2009 CET
FromGreen Party of Aldegar
ToDebating the Religion Bill
MessageSo....you want to remove religion's influence on government, but exert government influence on religion? Sounds REALLY fair...

Date09:16:45, August 14, 2009 CET
FromPeople's Party - Republican Democrats
ToDebating the Religion Bill
MessageFairness towards religions is apparently not one of the NAP's motivations, they want government control, so the discussion seems to be somewhat at cross-purposes.

Date19:14:50, August 14, 2009 CET
FromNational Action Party
ToDebating the Religion Bill
MessageGreen Party- Exactly, religion should serve the needs of the state.

Social Democrats- Yes

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 16

no
   

Total Seats: 483

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: In Particracy players are only allowed to play as one party at a time. Want to swap nations? Inactivate your current party and make a new one! Want to return? Request Moderation to reactivate your party on the forum!

    Random quote: "Congress is like diapers; it should be changed regularly as it gets full of the same thing." - Seen on a bumper sticker

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 82