Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5474
Next month in: 03:18:55
Server time: 00:41:04, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): hyraemous | LC73DunMHP | Paulo Nogueira | starfruit | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Public Safety

Details

Submitted by[?]: Communist Party of Kafuristan

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2130

Description[?]:

This is a limited selection of Equal Opportunity proposals which have been chosen because they aren't the sort of proposals which normally destroy bills, and they will help our nation and its health overall.

With these changes:

- All citizens may afford to be healthy, with contagious diseases reduced and therefore prevented, saving our healthcare's budget for other things and better services provided

- Sexually transmitted diseases will be reduced and prevented, not only with benefit to partners but helping future children as well who would otherwise be born with disease

- Those who avoid purchasing contraceptives due to price and obtainability obviously cannot afford to bear and raise a child, taking future strain from the welfare and adoption departments' budgets

The restriction of drug prices is to avoid high prices which citizens will feel inclined to pay as the government will kindly cover part of the cost. Drug prices shall remain the same, with dug company expenses reduced as well as expenses taken from the public wallet.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:26:40, October 22, 2005 CET
FromOld School Liberal Party
ToDebating the Public Safety
MessageGenerally too communist.

Date20:47:39, October 23, 2005 CET
FromSect of the Green Moon
ToDebating the Public Safety
MessageThis disagrees with my Free Market Policies.

Date01:59:56, October 24, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian and Federalist Alliance
ToDebating the Public Safety
MessageYou voting against would want thousands of teenage pregnancies, which could be averted with the passage of Art. I?

Date02:15:23, October 24, 2005 CET
FromOld School Liberal Party
ToDebating the Public Safety
MessageWe would vote against spending billions to buy contraceptives. We wouldn't mind spending a few billion less and subsidizing their cost, but our no vote is not just about that.

We refuse to have the government engage in a spending frenzy by subsidizing the cost of drugs to excess (which is the job of private insurance companies), and we definitely refuse to start introducing unnecessary controls into the market.

Date02:24:59, October 24, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian and Federalist Alliance
ToDebating the Public Safety
MessageNo contraceptives, no constitutional amendment.

Date02:26:37, October 24, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian and Federalist Alliance
ToDebating the Public Safety
MessageWe offer to any party voting against this law: vote for it, and we shall vote for the constitutional amendment, without which, your amend. is doomed to failure.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 146

no
   

Total Seats: 93

abstain
 

Total Seats: 61


Random fact: Whilst the use of non-English languages can be appropriate for nation names, party names, constitutional titles and other variables, English is the official language of communication in the game. All descriptive texts and public communications should be in English or at least appear alongside a full English translation.

Random quote: "If men want to oppose war, it is statism that they must oppose." - Ayn Rand

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 67