We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cleaning up Malivia
Details
Submitted by[?]: Protectorate Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2044
Description[?]:
| Recognizing that the governement must support public programs that benefit the nation even when they are not economical, we propose an increase in pollution control and support for recycling programs. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of pollution in industry.
Old value:: The government enforces moderate pollution restrictions.
Current: The government enforces moderate pollution restrictions.
Proposed: The government enforces highly restrictive industrial pollution standards.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government-sponsored recycling programs.
Old value:: There is no national policy regarding recycled garbage.
Current: Local governments decide about this.
Proposed: The government funds recycling facilities for public use.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 04:28:46, April 29, 2005 CET | From | Radical Centrists | To | Debating the Cleaning up Malivia |
| Message | Excellent stuff, we support. |
| Date | 11:40:33, April 29, 2005 CET | From | LibCom Party | To | Debating the Cleaning up Malivia |
| Message | Given the PP's previous attempt at 'highly restrictive pollution standards', which were in reality anything but, we'd need more detail on this before we could vote in favour. |
| Date | 12:20:17, April 29, 2005 CET | From | United Socialist Party | To | Debating the Cleaning up Malivia |
| Message | We are split in the bill, we do support Article 2 but we consider the already set moderate restrictions are quite enough for the time being. |
| Date | 16:56:25, April 29, 2005 CET | From | Radical Centrists | To | Debating the Cleaning up Malivia |
| Message | LibCom, I'd say the lack of qualification can be interpreted in a favourable manner. |
| Date | 18:05:43, April 29, 2005 CET | From | Social Republican Party | To | Debating the Cleaning up Malivia |
| Message | We agree with the USP, although we think it is a lesser evil to have heavier pollution controlls. |
| Date | 00:24:57, April 30, 2005 CET | From | Leviathan Party | To | Debating the Cleaning up Malivia |
| Message | Recycling is still a scam, and the PP's lack of explanation requires we oppose this bill. We suspect they are less than honest in these convictions. |
| Date | 18:00:46, April 30, 2005 CET | From |  Protectorate Party | To | Debating the Cleaning up Malivia |
| Message | We planned on leave implementation to the cabinet. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 56 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 31 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 13 |
| Random fact: Make sure to check out Particracy's wiki. http://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page |
| Random quote: "I am not a vegetarian because I love animals; I am a vegetarian because I hate plants." - A. Whitney Brown |