We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Kerris Free Trade Withdrawal Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Radical Nationalist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2804
Description[?]:
| This treaty is an attack upon parliamentary sovereignty. |
Proposals
Article 1
Withdraw from the Keris Free Trade Agreement.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:20:22, August 18, 2009 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Kerris Free Trade Withdrawal Act |
| Message | This bill is actually an attack on free trade: One of the core values of this country. |
| Date | 00:35:42, August 18, 2009 CET | From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the Kerris Free Trade Withdrawal Act |
| Message | I support free trade and while this treaty does state nations outside that continent may join. I'm unsure what benefits we gain by participating in this treaty. If the Liberal Party is willing to offer a logical argument for once, we are willing to be swayed. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 127 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 73 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite." - John Kenneth Galbraith |