We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Defense Industry Liberalization Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberaldemokratische Allianz
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2808
Description[?]:
| . |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: Defence industries are privately owned but subsidised by the state.
Current: Defence industries are privately owned but subsidised by the state.
Proposed: Defence industries are privately owned and not subsidised.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 07:33:25, August 25, 2009 CET | From | Konstitutionelle Monarchie Partei | To | Debating the Defense Industry Liberalization Act |
| Message | There needs to be some form of government involvement in the Defense Industry, even if it is just subsidies. I'm not very comfortable with leaving the entire construction of this nation's arms to the private sector with no government involvement. |
| Date | 07:35:12, August 25, 2009 CET | From | Liberaldemokratische Allianz | To | Debating the Defense Industry Liberalization Act |
| Message | The only government involvement now is giving money to private industries; it's just the government writing checks to the defense companies. |
| Date | 07:54:11, August 25, 2009 CET | From | Konstitutionelle Monarchie Partei | To | Debating the Defense Industry Liberalization Act |
| Message | Yes we are writing checks (horrible I know) and funding their operations and projects that end up being used by our armed forces and military. What the CLA is proposing we end this and thus ending any government involvement in our Defense industry and for what? Hulstria is in perfect economic shape to continue these subsidies; look at our GDP, income revenue, and 70 billion crown surplus, we're looking very good. I don't see a reason to change this law. |
| Date | 10:39:04, August 25, 2009 CET | From | Königs Reichspartei | To | Debating the Defense Industry Liberalization Act |
| Message | It work's well with CLA's Defense Exports Act, but as a whole: ludicrous |
| Date | 12:23:04, August 25, 2009 CET | From | Autoritäre Reich Allianz | To | Debating the Defense Industry Liberalization Act |
| Message | this seems preposterous, the government needs some input into the Defense industry, however small. |
| Date | 20:18:31, August 25, 2009 CET | From | Kolonial Partei | To | Debating the Defense Industry Liberalization Act |
| Message | The government should regulate the defense industry, not subsidize and encourage it. |
| Date | 10:04:38, August 26, 2009 CET | From | Kaiserlich Partei | To | Debating the Defense Industry Liberalization Act |
| Message | I think this Bill would be appropriate economic policy as it prevents Governments from having a direct influence in the private Board of Executives. |
| Date | 10:05:52, August 26, 2009 CET | From | Kaiserlich Partei | To | Debating the Defense Industry Liberalization Act |
| Message | I seek clarification on this Bill: 1. Is defence industries control of the armed forces, or control of the companies that manufacture goods used by the armed forces? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 330 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 395 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The use of proxy servers makes it impossible to detect multiing and is therefore forbidden. Players who access Particracy through a proxy will have their accounts inactivated. |
| Random quote: "The great masses of the people... will more easily fall victims to a big lie than to a small one." - Adolf Hitler |