Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5474
Next month in: 03:51:35
Server time: 12:08:24, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): GLNBei | Mbites2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of February 2810

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal Noocratic Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2810

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:16:11, August 30, 2009 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2810
MessageSo, the LNP now wants to create a cabinet with the URP and the RLP; the same people who have destroyed our country little by little for the last two decades.

This is, honestly, shameful. We thought the LNP wanted progress and success for our nation. This proposal clearly does not show that.

As a heads-up, we guarantee you that this would be a very unsuccessful cabinet due to the aforementioned reasons and many others (corruption, lack of a good working habit, lust for power, no a drop of interest in making our country better, etc. by the parties mentioned before---URP, RLP, and the RNP).

We will vote against this proposal and call on the LNP to rethink their position with respect to a cabinet proposal.

Date22:25:47, August 30, 2009 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2810
MessageSeriously, what corruption do you speak of? Your delusions sadden me.

Unlike the LP, the sane members of Parliament believe in cooperation and do not lust power. On the contrary, wasn't it the Liberals who craved the office of Prime Minister? I see no such desire on our side.

Date22:37:16, August 30, 2009 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2810
MessageTypical URP response. Get a new CD, my friends. This one is getting old.

Date04:15:32, August 31, 2009 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2810
MessageYou're right, I'm confused by your unsubstantiated statements as usual.

Date17:39:14, August 31, 2009 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2810
MessageAnother typical response that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

It may be partly our fault. We actually pay attention when you speak--even though it never makes any sense.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 108

no
    

Total Seats: 71

abstain
 

Total Seats: 21


Random fact: Any RP law granting extraordinary "emergency powers" or dictator-like powers to a government must be passed by at least a 2/3rds majority, but (like all RP laws) may always be overturned by a simple majority vote of the legislature.

Random quote: "A man who has no office to go to - I don't care who he is - is a trial of which you can have no conception." - George Bernard Shaw

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 61