Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5461
Next month in: 02:52:07
Server time: 17:07:52, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): ADM Drax | HopesFor | SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Private Housing

Details

Submitted by[?]: Anarcho-Capitalist Front

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2130

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date09:39:46, October 24, 2005 CET
FromTotalitarian Party
ToDebating the Private Housing
MessageI really don't see why the government cannot be allowed to establish gated communities. Do either of you want to explain your reasons for being against the current law?

Date14:38:49, October 24, 2005 CET
FromAnarcho-Capitalist Front
ToDebating the Private Housing
MessageIf the private sector can freely establish services, then the people can act in their own best interest without government intervention. In this situation the government is overstepping the economic freedom of the citizen and making choices for him.

Date14:41:18, October 24, 2005 CET
FromAnarcho-Capitalist Front
ToDebating the Private Housing
MessageIt is applying Occam's Razor to government. If there are two plausible policies, take the simpler route.

Date17:15:59, October 24, 2005 CET
FromTotalitarian Party
ToDebating the Private Housing
MessageDid you see my original argument for gated communities? Basically, I said that at times, the government may wish to establish their own gated community. Example: A community outside/within a military base for the family of soldiers/administrative personnel/whatever. The government would want to run the community, rather the private sector, because of security concerns.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 203

no
    

Total Seats: 164

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there.

Random quote: "Non-violence leads to the highest ethics, which is the goal of all evolution. Until we stop harming all other living beings, we are still savages." - Thomas A. Edison

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 55