We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: De-Regulation of Engery Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Party of Darnussia
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2130
Description[?]:
Allow Private companies so we can spend more money on other social welfare |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Energy regulation.
Old value:: Energy is provided by nationalised companies.
Current: Energy is provided by private companies but the prices they can charge are regulated.
Proposed: Energy is provided by private companies but the prices they can charge are regulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 01:49:00, October 24, 2005 CET | From | Progressive Democratic Alliance | To | Debating the De-Regulation of Engery Act |
Message | Yeah and later you will renationalize it again, bloody hypocrite. Anyway, I believe I already explained the quarrels I have with privatizing energy, it's just not the policy that works in this situation as many RL examples prove. |
Date | 23:54:03, October 24, 2005 CET | From | Free Market Party | To | Debating the De-Regulation of Engery Act |
Message | If government has the prices under the current market price the people will have to pay the costs by tax. Its only fair that everyone is paying exactly what he is spending. |
Date | 23:56:18, October 24, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the De-Regulation of Engery Act |
Message | So they can charge extortionate prices to the poor and less well off? |
Date | 23:58:25, October 24, 2005 CET | From | Free Market Party | To | Debating the De-Regulation of Engery Act |
Message | Monopoly in energy market is just a problem of the way goverment is privatizing the network. |
Date | 00:04:30, October 25, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the De-Regulation of Engery Act |
Message | I misunderstood what you meant...dont want to argue against my own law |
Date | 16:01:12, October 25, 2005 CET | From | Chinkopodian Economic Democrats | To | Debating the De-Regulation of Engery Act |
Message | Damn, I cannae vote on any current bills. >:( |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 56 | |||
no | Total Seats: 59 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 67 |
Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, special care must be taken to ensure realism is maintained when role-playing a government controlled by an ethnic and/or religious minority. If it is to be supposed that this government is supported by a majority of the population, then this should be plausibly and sufficiently role-played. The burden of proof is on the player or players role-playing such a regime to demonstrate that it is being done realistically |
Random quote: "How can you govern a country which has 246 varieties of cheese?" Charles De Gaulle, "Les Mots du General |