We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the The Axis Agreement
Details
Submitted by[?]: Totalitarian Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2131
Description[?]:
This bill asks for the ratification of the The Axis Agreement. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the The Axis Agreement.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 14:31:55, October 24, 2005 CET | From | Anarcho-Capitalist Front | To | Debating the Ratification of the The Axis Agreement |
Message | What would be the benefits of this? Would we be doing anything more than supporting nations that are continuously fighting wars? |
Date | 17:01:14, October 24, 2005 CET | From | Totalitarian Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the The Axis Agreement |
Message | This way, they won't be continuously fighting wars against us. The nations invited to sign are strong nations, and could be valuable allies if war does come to Gaduridos. While a mutual protection pact is not included in the agreement, a temporary alliance could be easily formed with any of the signatory nations. We feel this treaty will increase our nation's defensive capabilities, and will also help us establish good relations with nations (Deltaria, Kalistan and Kanjor) that we have had trouble with in the past. |
Date | 18:20:26, October 24, 2005 CET | From | Anarcho-Capitalist Front | To | Debating the Ratification of the The Axis Agreement |
Message | I see the principle behind this, but I still think this will draw us into war, rather than keep us out of it. The CLP has not known of a time that Deltaria was not at war or on the brink. |
Date | 18:39:02, October 24, 2005 CET | From | Totalitarian Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the The Axis Agreement |
Message | The treaty does not require us to form military alliances with signatory nations. If we needed help, we would ask a closer nation, such as Kalistan or Kanjor, assuming they sign they treaty. Deltaria is much too far away from Gaduridos to be of much use in a war. On the plus side, any nation considering declaring war on Gaduridos will also have to consider the threat of Deltaria attacking them. Have a look at Deltaria's defence budget: http://82.238.75.178:8085/particracy/main/budget.php?nationid=36 |
Date | 17:19:54, October 25, 2005 CET | From | Bátory Dynastia | To | Debating the Ratification of the The Axis Agreement |
Message | Deltaria is currently neither at war, nor on the brink of war. The Axis Agreement will bring peace and solidarity between our nations, and there are no requirements of Gaduri involvement in any Deltarian conflicts. Even though there is no guarantee Deltarians will intervene in Gaduri conflicts (although our sense of national pride will most likely drive us to the defence of our allies), the mighty armies of the Deltarians will prove to be a very VERY significant deterrent to any nation considering even *looking* at Gaduridos in the wrong way. This treaty will strengthen both our great nations. |
Date | 20:12:45, October 25, 2005 CET | From | Anarcho-Capitalist Front | To | Debating the Ratification of the The Axis Agreement |
Message | I can probably agree to this. I would prefer for Gaduridos to be safe because it is economically indespensible on the global market, but maybe this will help us gain ground in foreign markets. |
Date | 04:17:19, October 26, 2005 CET | From | Totalitarian Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the The Axis Agreement |
Message | Excellent. Moving to vote. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 336 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 31 |
Random fact: Real-life quotations may be used in Particracy, but the real-life speaker or author should always be referenced in an OOC (out-of-character) note alongside the quotation. |
Random quote: "How much more grievous are the consequences of anger than the causes of it." - Marcus Aurelius |