Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5474
Next month in: 00:38:38
Server time: 23:21:21, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): dnobb | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Mines and Chemical Biological Radiological and Nuclear Warfare Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Traditionalist Liberty Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2817

Description[?]:

Inhumane methods of warfare cannot be justified when we are a nation that fights for what is morally correct. Defense spending should be spent elswhere (ie. Training of troops, buying new rifles, tanks, radios and artillery guns).

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:33:50, September 09, 2009 CET
From Verititas Splendor Party
ToDebating the Mines and Chemical Biological Radiological and Nuclear Warfare Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

We support this cause wholeheartedly.

I yield back the balance of my time.

Date02:56:11, September 10, 2009 CET
From Federal Coalition
ToDebating the Mines and Chemical Biological Radiological and Nuclear Warfare Act
MessageMr. Speaker;

I disagree, strenghth is a deterant. I would never hope to use it but the power should be there as an option.

I yield the floor

Date03:52:30, September 10, 2009 CET
From Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party)
ToDebating the Mines and Chemical Biological Radiological and Nuclear Warfare Act
MessageWe see no reason to cripple our nation defence and encourage the Zionist regime of Beiteynu to invade our land.

Date05:53:29, September 13, 2009 CET
From Verititas Splendor Party
ToDebating the Mines and Chemical Biological Radiological and Nuclear Warfare Act
MessageInstead we can follow your proposal and disband the defences. =]


Date13:09:16, September 13, 2009 CET
From Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party)
ToDebating the Mines and Chemical Biological Radiological and Nuclear Warfare Act
MessageIf the VSP would have bother to actually read the bill before commenting, they would have understood that the bill that they claim are a reaffirmation bill. And that the DP have vote NO.

We must question VSP ability to participate in parliament when they failed to even understand a simple bill. Also, your party are currently voting yes for that.

Date00:08:47, September 14, 2009 CET
From Federal Coalition
ToDebating the Mines and Chemical Biological Radiological and Nuclear Warfare Act
MessageI agree with the VSP

Date00:09:02, September 14, 2009 CET
From Federal Coalition
ToDebating the Mines and Chemical Biological Radiological and Nuclear Warfare Act
MessageBut not the Bill

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 0

no
  

Total Seats: 646

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: References to prominent real-life persons are not allowed. This includes references to philosophies featuring the name of a real-life person (eg. "Marxism", "Thatcherism", "Keynesianism").

Random quote: "The payment of taxes gives a right to protection." - James M. Wayne

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 78