Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5460
Next month in: 02:55:41
Server time: 13:04:18, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): aai14 | Brazil25 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Anti-Big Brother Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Protectorate Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2132

Description[?]:

The powers of govenment are starting to invade the rights of our citizens.
This must be pushed back before we live in a police state.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:13:23, October 24, 2005 CET
FromMinisterial Party
ToDebating the Anti-Big Brother Bill
MessageOh please, don't start going on about conspiracies. This would not be supported by us.

Date19:32:12, October 24, 2005 CET
From Protectorate Party
ToDebating the Anti-Big Brother Bill
Messageno conspiracies, just there is no need for either of these intrusions into individual lives.

Date19:55:27, October 24, 2005 CET
FromMinisterial Party
ToDebating the Anti-Big Brother Bill
MessageAh yes, it'd be much better with identities easily stolen due to lack of ID cards!

Ah yes, useless foreign propoganda and drivel on our TV sets! What a great idea!

Date20:43:06, October 24, 2005 CET
From Protectorate Party
ToDebating the Anti-Big Brother Bill
Messageso censorship is your answer?

Date21:26:14, October 24, 2005 CET
FromMinisterial Party
ToDebating the Anti-Big Brother Bill
MessageYes.

Date22:30:03, October 24, 2005 CET
FromMalivia Democratic Party
ToDebating the Anti-Big Brother Bill
MessageSort of like the PP wants to censor advertising?

In any case, the reason why we have voluntary ID cards is for identification, the same as drivers licences and such, and these ID cards can carry things like medical information which would be very helpful in cases the individual in unconcience.

That is why they are voluntary and not mandatory, it gives people a choice whether they want this so called 'government intrusion'.

Now, if you remove #1, I'll be more than happy to vote for this.

Date00:25:11, October 25, 2005 CET
FromLibCom Party
ToDebating the Anti-Big Brother Bill
MessageWe support both proposals.

Date17:03:00, October 25, 2005 CET
From Protectorate Party
ToDebating the Anti-Big Brother Bill
Messagewhy do these ids need to be provided at the federal level? Can not the province governments handle this? Do we want a national driver's licence or province administered tests. If province then this whole plan can be shifted down to that level and the info can be put on the licences.
Optional ids rapidly do not become optional, because stores and other buisnesses will require this id to do business like buying alcohol or opening a bank account.

And look at the bright side MDP, if this law is passed, companies can advertise on other nation's media and reach our citizens.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 155

no
 

Total Seats: 44

abstain
   

Total Seats: 102


Random fact: Don't put "the" as the first word in your party name, because when parties are referred to in news reports, their names are preceded with "the", e.g. the [Socialist Party] has lost.

Random quote: "I don't believe you need to be bitch to succeed in business" - Lucinda Redwood, former Luthorian-Dorvish businesswoman

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 69