Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5461
Next month in: 01:36:26
Server time: 10:23:33, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Kiwiis | MyungLuth | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: The Council of Kensington

Details

Submitted by[?]: Verititas Splendor Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2817

Description[?]:

A separation of Church and State is important in maintaining viable and thriving religion. Without the intertwining of Church and State, political factors are not as important as theological factors.

Mind you, unless Chippie here, of the DP would want there to be an emperor cult, I would recommend the support of this bill.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date06:14:55, September 13, 2009 CET
FromNrzi Prta (Democratic Party)
ToDebating the The Council of Kensington
MessageWe see no reason to abolished 200 years of culture and tradition and as we have already stated before, we will accept the abolishment of mandatory membership, any other change is unacceptable to us.

Date13:57:14, September 13, 2009 CET
FromVerititas Splendor Party
ToDebating the The Council of Kensington
MessageThis "tradition" is 200 years old, for the other numerous years of our nation, there have been more years without a national religion than without. I hardly call it tradition.

But it is still 200 years old. The problem is that just because this idea is old, does not mean that it is correct. But if your mind fails to comprehend such a simple statement, the idea of not having an official state religion is a much longer tradition.

We would also like to point out the harm that this causes to the religion, as well as the lack of need of religion. If the mandatory religion is an Emperor Cult, then what a weak god he must be, for as much as an emperor may delude himself and his people, he is no more able to show all-encompassing love or justice any more than a mere stone worker.

Should the religion be something of Christianity or Islam (for we know that the DP would not allow the lesser Semitic religion be the official religion), these religions are focused on a divine kingship, not a physical one, and as I pointed out previously, this king is not divine. (If you fail to agree again, take note that both Christianity and Islam believe that public revelation (like the election of David, new Scripture, etc (with exception to the Last Things) have ceased (Islam with the ascension of Mohammed to Heaven in his flaming chariot, and Christianity with the death of the apostle John).

Any change may be unnacceptable to you, for this is because your heart has hardened, and to make up for it, your brain has softened in return.

I yield back the balance of my time.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 1

no
 

Total Seats: 645

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: If there are no parties in your nation with seats, feel free to visit the forum and request an early election on the Early Election Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4362

Random quote: "Oh, judge, your damn laws: the good people don't need them and the bad people don't follow them so what good are they?" - Ammon Hennacy

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 48