We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Serious Emergency Contingency Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Cult of Death
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2820
Description[?]:
| This bill aims to put in place contingency apparatus to help in the case of serious man-made/natural emergencies |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of chemical and biological weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation can only use chemical or biological weapons on non-civilan areas.
Current: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weaponry in warfare.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to use chemical or biological weapons in warfare for any reason.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place and the military is not allowed to play any part in it.
Current: A civilian police force is in place and the military is not allowed to play any part in it.
Proposed: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:12:33, September 17, 2009 CET | From | Partido Democratico Social | To | Debating the Serious Emergency Contingency Bill |
| Message | We'd agree to 2 but not to 1 |
| Date | 19:42:40, September 18, 2009 CET | From | Partido Unionista | To | Debating the Serious Emergency Contingency Bill |
| Message | We would agree to the second part but not the first |
| Date | 23:05:07, September 18, 2009 CET | From | Libertario Aliatu | To | Debating the Serious Emergency Contingency Bill |
| Message | Could you two just sleep together and be done with it? We agree with one and can live with two. |
| Date | 04:17:11, September 19, 2009 CET | From | Partido Democratico Social | To | Debating the Serious Emergency Contingency Bill |
| Message | Now how could we have missed this gem? Haven't laughed so hard since the GNP's remark about being against a bill but aroused by it |
| Date | 19:03:53, September 19, 2009 CET | From | Gaduridos National Party | To | Debating the Serious Emergency Contingency Bill |
| Message | We agree with the Libertarians on this one. We've truly never seen two parties jump into bed with each other so quickly, and we watch a lot of porn. |
| Date | 19:04:25, September 19, 2009 CET | From | Gaduridos National Party | To | Debating the Serious Emergency Contingency Bill |
| Message | We agree with the Libertarians on this one. We've truly never seen two parties jump into bed with each other so quickly, and we watch a lot of porn. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 275 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 230 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363 |
| Random quote: "It is the hallmark of great society to debate and disagree without resorting to violence." - Mathew Jameson, former Hutorian politician |