Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5471
Next month in: 02:05:00
Server time: 01:54:59, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): ameerali | Dx6743 | hexaus18 | hyraemous | saintstiiizy | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Income tax proposal of April 2820

Details

Submitted by[?]: Det Kazulianske Arbeiderparti

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill proposes to change income taxes. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2820

Description[?]:

The Høyre Liberalistisk Folkeparti propose to adjust the government's income tax policy to better address the economic situation of the Nordiske Republikken av Kazulia.

I think this also should please SV since we remove both 5000 and 7000 from the tax system. taxation start at 10.000

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:41:14, September 20, 2009 CET
FromDet Kazulianske Arbeiderparti
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of April 2820
MessageWe will remove 77.752.446.645 from our income and that will leave us at a 309.248.954.359 surplus in the budget.

Date01:41:37, September 20, 2009 CET
FromDet Kazulianske Arbeiderparti
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of April 2820
MessageAnd the rest will stay the same.

Date02:15:56, September 20, 2009 CET
FromSosialistisk Venstreparti
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of April 2820
MessageWe support tax cuts for the poor - but are determined to use every opportunity we have to increase taxes for the rich.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 467

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
      

    Total Seats: 70


    Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

    Random quote: "It depends upon what the meaning of the word 'is' is." - Bill Clinton

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 129