Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5460
Next month in: 02:21:04
Server time: 09:38:55, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Liberalization Plan - Phase Three Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Classical Liberal Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2823

Description[?]:

Phase Three of our Master Plan.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date07:31:58, September 24, 2009 CET
FromPaleoconservative Party
ToDebating the Liberalization Plan - Phase Three Act
MessageEr, yeah...thanks for putting the bill to a vote immediately, just like you did with the last one. =/

Date01:17:31, September 25, 2009 CET
FromClassical Liberal Party
ToDebating the Liberalization Plan - Phase Three Act
MessageThere was nothing to discuss.

Date05:54:18, September 25, 2009 CET
FromPaleoconservative Party
ToDebating the Liberalization Plan - Phase Three Act
MessageOh, right, nothing. Other than the whole approval/disapproval of the bill issue – the primary purpose the debate phase exists. =|

Date07:17:42, September 25, 2009 CET
FromClassical Liberal Party
ToDebating the Liberalization Plan - Phase Three Act
MessageIt was just that, well, our party didn't really care. We were not prepared to make any changes to this bill, it is a central part of our Liberalization Plan. You can voice your concerns in the voting stage, because they aren't going to make any difference anyway. =|

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 324

no
  

Total Seats: 76

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there.

    Random quote: Although I understand and respect the intentions behind the gesture, this is not something that is universally understood or appreciated, and it tends to give out a negative impression of our party. ~ Anton Weinreich, General Secretary of the Dorvish Communist Party, pleading with his members to stop burning the national flag

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 60