We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Identity Protection Act 2134
Details
Submitted by[?]: Anti-Particracy and Unionist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2135
Description[?]:
| National identity should not be a requirement, even if you don't have to carry it, it should be voluntary. Those who cannot prove their ID by some acceptable means, will not get everything they want. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government-issued identity card policy.
Old value:: All citizens are issued with identity cards but are not required to carry them.
Current: All citizens are issued with identity cards but are not required to carry them.
Proposed: Citizens are issued with identity cards on a voluntary basis.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:08:11, October 25, 2005 CET | From | Anti-Particracy and Unionist Party | To | Debating the Identity Protection Act 2134 |
| Message | Please read some of this at least: http://www.no2id.org/IDSchemes/whyNot.php |
| Date | 01:24:32, October 26, 2005 CET | From | Roman Imperialist Party | To | Debating the Identity Protection Act 2134 |
| Message | Roman Imperialist Party does not support overturning ID cards. |
| Date | 01:33:37, October 26, 2005 CET | From | New Daio Party | To | Debating the Identity Protection Act 2134 |
| Message | Nor does the Praetoral Party. It is not facist, it is a needed and logical step taken to assure that someone is who they say they are. |
| Date | 11:46:18, October 26, 2005 CET | From | Labor Party | To | Debating the Identity Protection Act 2134 |
| Message | The current Bill was recently passed and we support it still. |
| Date | 16:05:25, October 27, 2005 CET | From | People's Democratic Party | To | Debating the Identity Protection Act 2134 |
| Message | Yes, we too will vote this down. The current bill doesn't even force people to cary them so it isn't a big deal. |
| Date | 20:36:28, October 30, 2005 CET | From | Progressive Party | To | Debating the Identity Protection Act 2134 |
| Message | The Progressive Party would vote against this bill. ID cards are neccisary; especially in the event of a natural disaster (i.e. Hurricane Season Gulf Coast US) |
| Date | 10:39:23, November 02, 2005 CET | From | Anti-Particracy and Unionist Party | To | Debating the Identity Protection Act 2134 |
| Message | I have compromised and put this to the vote. |
| Date | 00:46:11, November 03, 2005 CET | From | Labor Party | To | Debating the Identity Protection Act 2134 |
| Message | Agree with changes |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 162 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 195 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 44 |
| Random fact: The influence a bill has on elections decreases over time, until it eventually is no longer relevant. This can explain shifts in your party's position to the electorate and your visibility. |
| Random quote: "How much more grievous are the consequences of anger than the causes of it." - Marcus Aurelius |