We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Animal Rights Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Sosialistisk Venstreparti
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2824
Description[?]:
The testing of cosmetics on animals is completely unnecessary and without any medical or scientific justification. We also want to ban whaling which is cruel and again unnecessary. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in cosmetics research.
Old value:: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is regulated.
Current: Animals may not be used for testing cosmetics products.
Proposed: Animals may not be used for testing cosmetics products.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's stance on whaling.
Old value:: Commercial whaling is illegal, but whaling for scientific purposes is allowed.
Current: Whaling is illegal.
Proposed: Whaling is illegal.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:03:03, September 27, 2009 CET | From | Det Kazulianske Arbeiderparti | To | Debating the Animal Rights Act |
Message | We are sorry sv, we cant agree to this since AP believes in science. It is cruel but we will always set humans before animals therefore the testing on animals wich is regulated and whaling wich is illegal but legal for science. |
Date | 21:14:19, September 27, 2009 CET | From | Sosialistisk Venstreparti | To | Debating the Animal Rights Act |
Message | This does not ban the testing of medicines on animals (which we support under certain circumstances). It only bans the testing of cosmetics which is for example shampoo, make-up, sun cream, body lotion etc. We believe there is no medical or scientific justification to test cosmetics on animals. |
Date | 21:18:48, September 27, 2009 CET | From | Sosialistisk Venstreparti | To | Debating the Animal Rights Act |
Message | We also feel that science is used simply as an excuse to carry out whaling and that it's of no actual benefit either for our economy or for Kazulia's social or scientific progress. If it turns out that there is a strong scientific need for whaling in future though then we would of course consider rethinking our position. |
Date | 21:18:56, September 27, 2009 CET | From | Det Kazulianske Arbeiderparti | To | Debating the Animal Rights Act |
Message | If you propose article 1 for itself i will vote yes |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 230 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 307 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Selucia is Particracy's modern take on Ancient Rome, located on the continent of Majatra. |
Random quote: "History is made by angry minorities, not by passive majorities." - Fareed Zakaria |