We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the CIS Community Treaty
Details
Submitted by[?]: Novy Smer Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2131
Description[?]:
This bill asks for the ratification of the CIS Community Treaty. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the CIS Community Treaty.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 20:42:38, October 25, 2005 CET | From | Novy Smer Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the CIS Community Treaty |
Message | This seems to be the emerging new UN of the particracy world. We should join. |
Date | 21:48:20, October 25, 2005 CET | From | Ducal Delegation | To | Debating the Ratification of the CIS Community Treaty |
Message | Twenty-five articles??? His Grace can't be bothered to read this because it looks complicated, but since it's written by foreigners, he instinctively distrusts it...perhaps he would re-consider his position if his Delegation were invited into the Cabinet... Percy Waterman (Personal Secretary to the Grand Duke of Hikirena) |
Date | 01:09:55, October 26, 2005 CET | From | Progressive Conservatives | To | Debating the Ratification of the CIS Community Treaty |
Message | While this treaty sounds somewhat promising, we cannot understand why we should bother spending time reading through such a long, wordy, and annoyingly garrulous piece of text when it doesn't even have proposals (hence, commitment to fundamental principles). The PC Party is amused by Novy Smer's choice of treaty to ratify and cannot understand why and how such an incompetent party as the Novy Smer got the Foreign Ministry post (of course, other than through illegitimate actions). The Novy Smer, after all, cannot even form coherent or remotely logical and sensible arguments when it comes to defending their own views (if they even have any real values, view, or principles). To prove this, simply review the debate that transpired here: http://82.238.75.178:8085/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=26337 |
Date | 19:47:31, October 26, 2005 CET | From | Novy Smer Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the CIS Community Treaty |
Message | Oh! Smell her! |
Date | 23:37:45, October 26, 2005 CET | From | Progressive Conservatives | To | Debating the Ratification of the CIS Community Treaty |
Message | Sorry, but no points for maturity there, buddy. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 141 | |||
no | Total Seats: 125 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 55 |
Random fact: Did you know you can change the official name of your nation? All you need to do is draw up a new name that is in accordance with the Nation Renaming Guide, pass a bill proposing the name change with a two-thirds majority and then post a request to Moderation on the "Renaming Requests" thread. You can change city and region names in this way too. |
Random quote: "Idealism is fine; but as it approaches reality, the cost becomes prohibitive." - William F. Buckley, Jr. |