We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: National Arms Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Traditionalist Liberty Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2828
Description[?]:
A nation that fights a war with dirty tactics does not deserve to win. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning biological and chemical weaponry.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to develop, construct and store biological and chemical weapons.
Current: The nation reserves the right to develop, construct and store biological and chemical weapons.
Proposed: The nation shall never purchase, produce, or store biological or chemical weaponry, for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards the use of land mines by the army.
Old value:: The use of land mines is allowed.
Current: The use of land mines is allowed.
Proposed: The use of land mines is prohibited.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 07:46:44, October 05, 2009 CET | From | Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party) | To | Debating the National Arms Act |
Message | This attempt to cripple our nation's defense is disgusting and unacceptable to the government. |
Date | 21:34:48, October 05, 2009 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the National Arms Act |
Message | Mr. Speaker, It should be quite clear to the members of this body and the people of Pontesi that the Democrat party has warmongering tendencies. Yield. |
Date | 13:41:17, October 06, 2009 CET | From | Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party) | To | Debating the National Arms Act |
Message | It should also be clear that the Freedom Parry and Traditionalist Liberty Party attempt to cripple our nation's defense is an act of aggression aganist our Empire. |
Date | 18:42:31, October 06, 2009 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the National Arms Act |
Message | Mr. Speaker, It should be clear that any party voting against this bill only desires to warmonger and destroy peace with other nations. Yield. |
Date | 18:43:07, October 06, 2009 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the National Arms Act |
Message | Mr. Speaker, It should be clear that any party voting against this bill only desires to warmonger and destroy peace with other nations. Yield. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 350 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 400 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
Random quote: "The radical right is so homophobic that they're blaming global warming on the AIDS quilt." - Dennis Miller |