Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5461
Next month in: 03:44:27
Server time: 00:15:32, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (6): BMsellar | friedrich3 | jamescfm-kaf | Moderation | SocDemDundorfian | VojmatDun | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: National Arms Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Traditionalist Liberty Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2828

Description[?]:

A nation that fights a war with dirty tactics does not deserve to win.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date07:46:44, October 05, 2009 CET
FromNrzi Prta (Democratic Party)
ToDebating the National Arms Act
MessageThis attempt to cripple our nation's defense is disgusting and unacceptable to the government.

Date21:34:48, October 05, 2009 CET
FromFreedom Party
ToDebating the National Arms Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

It should be quite clear to the members of this body and the people of Pontesi that the Democrat party has warmongering tendencies.

Yield.

Date13:41:17, October 06, 2009 CET
FromNrzi Prta (Democratic Party)
ToDebating the National Arms Act
MessageIt should also be clear that the Freedom Parry and Traditionalist Liberty Party attempt to cripple our nation's defense is an act of aggression aganist our Empire.

Date18:42:31, October 06, 2009 CET
FromFreedom Party
ToDebating the National Arms Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

It should be clear that any party voting against this bill only desires to warmonger and destroy peace with other nations.

Yield.

Date18:43:07, October 06, 2009 CET
FromFreedom Party
ToDebating the National Arms Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

It should be clear that any party voting against this bill only desires to warmonger and destroy peace with other nations.

Yield.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 350

no
   

Total Seats: 400

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining.

    Random quote: "The radical right is so homophobic that they're blaming global warming on the AIDS quilt." - Dennis Miller

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 56