Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5474
Next month in: 03:08:41
Server time: 04:51:18, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): itsjustgav | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: (IP) Alliance Cabinet Proposal of December 2830

Details

Submitted by[?]: Supporters of Science in Design (IP)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2832

Description[?]:

The following is a proposed alliance between the Supporters of Science in Design and the Freedom Party.

The parties shall:
Propose a cabinet in which the Freedom Party holds 3 ministries at first.
Following the first election in which both SSD and the FP have seats a new cabinet shall be proposed in which the ministries are divided proportionally based upon seat share.
Protect the Hunter monarchy, by not changing the Head of State name in such a way that removes recognition of the monarchy.
Whichever party holds a majority of seats shall be entitled to the position of Ouparath (Prime Minister, the Head of Government)

The Freedom Party shall add (IP) to the end of its name, so as to signify support for the Imperial Protectorates.

The Supporters of Science in Design shall grant royal titles to officials in the Freedom Party.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:43:05, October 11, 2009 CET
FromKonservative Partei Malivia
ToDebating the (IP) Alliance Cabinet Proposal of December 2830
Messagewell...Let's wait who the voters decide

Date20:09:00, October 11, 2009 CET
FromSupporters of Science in Design (IP)
ToDebating the (IP) Alliance Cabinet Proposal of December 2830
MessageDoes the Freedom Party disagree with any of the specific parts of this alliance proposal? For the unity of the nation, we hope that we can find common ground.

-Chai Vernul,
Member of Parliament, Supporters of Science in Design

Date20:55:55, October 11, 2009 CET
FromKonservative Partei Malivia
ToDebating the (IP) Alliance Cabinet Proposal of December 2830
MessageOf course, we support our king.But we think it is really important for our majersity the king that we have also a opposition in his glorious country.But we can talk together.It would be very important for us that the term length of the parliament is not six years but maybe only 4 years.

Long live our king!

Date21:02:13, October 12, 2009 CET
FromSupporters of Science in Design (IP)
ToDebating the (IP) Alliance Cabinet Proposal of December 2830
MessageWe are hesitant to have more frequent elections, because they put the nation at greater risk of being undermined by foreign powers. Infrequent elections serve the interest of Malivian stability. That said, we are willing to pose a compromise of 5 years.

-Anushe Outan,
Ouparath/Head of Government,
Gerajan Protectorates of Malivia/Supporters of Science in Design

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 75

no
 

Total Seats: 0

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: The forum contains a lot of useful information, it has updates to the game, role playing between nations, news and discussion. http://forum.particracy.net/

Random quote: "And I said on my program, if, if the Americans go in and overthrow Saddam Hussein and it's clean, he has nothing, I will apologize to the nation, and I will not trust the Bush Administration again." - Bill O'Reilly

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 47