We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Landmines, once and for all
Details
Submitted by[?]: Verititas Splendor Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2832
Description[?]:
These contraptions are not suited for modern warfare. These are suited to the prolonged destruction of innocent lives. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards the use of land mines by the army.
Old value:: The use of land mines is allowed.
Current: The use of land mines is allowed.
Proposed: The use of land mines is prohibited.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:39:57, October 12, 2009 CET | From | One Nation Conservative Party | To | Debating the Landmines, once and for all |
Message | This can't pass before the election. |
Date | 00:59:40, October 13, 2009 CET | From | Verititas Splendor Party | To | Debating the Landmines, once and for all |
Message | I am aware, but there is no way to retract it from voting. |
Date | 16:31:35, October 13, 2009 CET | From | Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party) | To | Debating the Landmines, once and for all |
Message | It's our belief that land mines should be allowed to used to defense Pontesi from possible foreign aggression, no method shouldn't be deemed unnecessary or inhumane when it come to the defense of our nation. Against |
Date | 18:32:14, October 13, 2009 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Landmines, once and for all |
Message | Mr. Speaker, Those who are in favor of these horrid weapons should prove that they are necessary. When was the last war? How was it started? Could we have avoided it? Can we simply be peaceful traders with other nations and not be aggresive with our policies? Yield. |
Date | 19:33:06, October 13, 2009 CET | From | Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party) | To | Debating the Landmines, once and for all |
Message | As Freedom Party is ignorance of our nation history and policy, we would gladly supply them with insight detail into our last conflict. The last war is invasion of Pontesi by the so call Global Peacekeeping Organization using Nuclear attack against our nation. We have in no way make any aggressive policy to the organization and the action was deemed as a war-crime and the leader of the GPO were killed by Pontesian Forces. Now, let me ask you whether what kind of policy is necessary to stop a warmongering psychotic leader from attacking other nation? |
Date | 23:48:40, October 13, 2009 CET | From | Verititas Splendor Party | To | Debating the Landmines, once and for all |
Message | The VSP has already implemented its one step policy for disarming these conflicts. |
Date | 06:30:31, October 14, 2009 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Landmines, once and for all |
Message | HA!! no agressive policies, eh? That's a farce. You have this country ARMED TO THE TEETH! It's an affront to ALL peace-loving nations. |
Date | 10:44:26, October 14, 2009 CET | From | Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party) | To | Debating the Landmines, once and for all |
Message | Those who don't understand war can never achieved peace. It had never been our policy to actively threaten other nation, but to maintain an ability to defense the nation from other aggression, the policy that have proved to be vital to our achievement in repelling the GPO invasion and to ensure the continue existence of our nation. The Freedom Party must understand the nation needs to defense itself, it is a horror to our nation to consider demilitarized our nation to our current state of weakness when our neighbor continue to actively seeks WMD and improve their military. Arming the nation to defense itself is the only policy for our nation when there is no collective defense that can provided peace to Terra. Your current action is an affront to former heroes of Pontesi, to those who have died defending our nation and those who sacrificed their life so that the Pontesian Dynastic Empire remains until now. |
Date | 13:09:16, October 14, 2009 CET | From | One Nation Conservative Party | To | Debating the Landmines, once and for all |
Message | Indeed, the ONCP was a founding father of this Pontesian relam and throughout our history, we have never engaged in combat with another nation over anything other than issues related to Pontesian territorial integrity. The mines are for the defence of this nation and are not intended nor indeed deployable as an offensive weapon. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 360 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 390 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: It is possible for a player to transfer ownership of a character or a royal house to another player. This should be done in a public way, such as on the Character Transfers thread, so that if a dispute arises in the future, Moderation can be pointed towards evidence of the transfer. |
Random quote: "Corruption greases the wheels of government, and my private jet." - Sung Dae Kim, former Dranian politician |