We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Repeal of the Cabinet Reform Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Konstitutionelle Monarchie Partei
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2838
Description[?]:
| The Repeal of the Cabinet Reform Act formally abolishes the office/title of the Vizestaatsminister and in effect the Cabinet Reform Act of 2700 upon passing by a majority of the Imperial Diet. *Cabinet Reform Act* http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=237304 |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:09:11, October 25, 2009 CET | From | Konstitutionelle Monarchie Partei | To | Debating the Repeal of the Cabinet Reform Act |
| Message | Seeing as the title/office of the Vizestaatsminister has been not used in the past several cabinets and noting a quote towards the conclusion of our past cabinet debates, "There should be no provision for Vizestaatsminister in either cabinet" (a mandate for such an abolishment) the Fascist Authority Party believes that the Imperial Diet should move to abolish this title as it has become of no importance to the political atmosphere of Greater Hulstria. |
| Date | 20:56:39, October 25, 2009 CET | From | Liberaldemokratische Allianz | To | Debating the Repeal of the Cabinet Reform Act |
| Message | Just because an optional title found in law has not been used it does not mean that it should be repealed. The law should remain on the books as an option for future Diets to use, or not use, as they see fit. |
| Date | 22:18:27, October 25, 2009 CET | From | Konstitutionelle Monarchie Partei | To | Debating the Repeal of the Cabinet Reform Act |
| Message | Then why was the Vizestaatsministership openly opposed by the CLA in the last cabinet then? Why is this cabinet not fitting for a Vizestaatsminister? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 609 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 116 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: “Their cheap talk of the 'greater good' is a thinly concealed excuse for subordinating the people to the institutionalized violence that is the state.” - Margaret Woodhall, former Dranian politician |