We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Television Content Reform Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Shadow Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2135
Description[?]:
Current: Sexually explicit content may only be shown during hours that very few children watch. Nudity may be shown all day long. Proposed: The time at which sexually explicit content or nudity may only be shown on television will be during hours that very few children watch. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The time at which sexually explicit content may be shown on broadcast television (if allowed).
Old value:: Sexually explicit content may only be shown during hours that very few children watch. Nudity may be shown all day long.
Current: Sexually explicit content or nudity may only be shown during hours that very few children watch television
Proposed: Sexually explicit content or nudity may only be shown during hours that very few children watch television
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 06:32:01, October 27, 2005 CET | From | First Socialist Party | To | Debating the Television Content Reform Act |
Message | Delete and try again. |
Date | 14:55:53, October 27, 2005 CET | From | United Military Party | To | Debating the Television Content Reform Act |
Message | Please read the tutorial |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 0 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 184 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: There is a phpBB forum dedicated to Particracy. Please click the Forum link in the top game menu. Additions to the game, suggestions and discussion is held there so get involved. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights |