We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Power Anticipations
Details
Submitted by[?]: Communist Party of Kafuristan
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2132
Description[?]:
| Although we primarily export so-called "black gold", we should definitely look towards using methods to generate alternative power methods in the near future. They are much more stable. When our black gold may eventually run out, we will not be impacted nearly as much if we begin preparing for the future's energy generation methods today. Also, the government will assure a much more stable role of our power grid, although private companies are still fully allowed to generate power. The local governments should also be able to maintain their power grid to assure that they remain productive and reliable. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on energy generation.
Old value:: Private power stations provide energy for the entire power grid.
Current: Small scale private electrical generation is permitted but most energy is generated by a government-owned company.
Proposed: Private and public power stations exist side-by-side.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on the nation's power grid.
Old value:: Multiple private companies each own and maintain sections of the national power grid.
Current: Multiple private companies each own and maintain sections of the national power grid.
Proposed: Each region owns and maintains its own power grid.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on nuclear power.
Old value:: The decision is left up to local governments.
Current: The government encourages nuclear power (subsidies, tax relief etc).
Proposed: The government requires most energy to be generated by nuclear power.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:39:25, October 27, 2005 CET | From | Sect of the Green Moon | To | Debating the Power Anticipations |
| Message | I only like article 3 |
| Date | 02:01:27, October 28, 2005 CET | From | Communist Party of Kafuristan | To | Debating the Power Anticipations |
| Message | Of course, it is also your opinion that we should sell the presidential seat in order to generate revenue. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 93 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 175 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 32 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "Changing the way we measure things is vital. So is decompartmentalising society making sure that economics and politics are not divorced from other crucial areas of life." - David Attenborough |