We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Relationship Morality Initiative II
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Socialists
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2134
Description[?]:
We wish to encourage healthy and fruitful families, and to discourage any unnatural behaviour in relationships. Let the latter happen in the privacy of their homes, not in public. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on sexual relations.
Old value:: Sexual relation laws are set by local governments.
Current: Heterosexual relationships only are legal for consenting adults.
Proposed: Homosexual relations are illegal, but are not prosecuted.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 17:54:05, October 27, 2005 CET | From | United Centrists | To | Debating the Relationship Morality Initiative II |
Message | We still stand by our support of homosexual rights, so we must oppose the proposal. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 199 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 300 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 107 |
Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
Random quote: "An idealist is one who, on noticing that roses smell better than a cabbage, concludes that it will also make better soup." - H. L. Mencken |