We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Engery PPP Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Party of Darnussia
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2132
Description[?]:
| A Public-Private Partnership will improve our ecomony, and our laws on employee protection will not hurt the wokers nor the poor. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on energy generation.
Old value:: Small scale private electrical generation is permitted but most energy is generated by a government-owned company.
Current: Private power stations provide energy for the entire power grid.
Proposed: Private and public power stations exist side-by-side.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:25:59, October 27, 2005 CET | From | Vuloch Ca Korzia | To | Debating the Engery PPP Act |
| Message | Pop-ulist! Pop-ulist! *laughs and jumps up and down* |
| Date | 19:25:05, October 27, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Engery PPP Act |
| Message | *slaps CoL silly* |
| Date | 00:23:37, October 28, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Engery PPP Act |
| Message | *joins in on the slapping* |
| Date | 11:42:26, October 28, 2005 CET | From | Vuloch Ca Korzia | To | Debating the Engery PPP Act |
| Message | SLAPBACK! |
| Date | 14:55:45, October 28, 2005 CET | From | Chinkopodian Economic Democrats | To | Debating the Engery PPP Act |
| Message | *slaps everyone with a tuna fish* |
| Date | 15:38:30, October 28, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Engery PPP Act |
| Message | *Rubs face and gives CED a Wedgie* |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 91 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 70 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 40 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "Terror is only justice: prompt, severe and inflexible; it is then an emanation of virtue; it is less a distinct principle than a natural consequence of the general principle of democracy, applied to the most pressing wants of the country." - Maximilien Robespierre |