Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5474
Next month in: 02:25:00
Server time: 13:34:59, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): AethanKal | JVTA | lulus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Environment Protection Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2852

Description[?]:

An act to protect the environment of the Pontesian Dynastic Empire.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:20:30, November 20, 2009 CET
From Optimate Party
ToDebating the Environment Protection Act
MessageThe Optimate Party believes there should be a national currency, but not a national policy on pets. We will vote against this should it reach the floor.

Date04:35:17, November 20, 2009 CET
From Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party)
ToDebating the Environment Protection Act
MessageWould the optimate Party agreed to this bill if the article about the policy regarding the ownership of domesticated animals as pet is removed?

http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=270921 : With regard to currency.

Date22:16:02, November 20, 2009 CET
From Pnték Prsakij Prta (Phalangists)
ToDebating the Environment Protection Act
MessageAlthough we applaud the concern of the DP for their concern for the environment, we shall be opposing this legislation.

Date01:58:52, November 21, 2009 CET
From Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party)
ToDebating the Environment Protection Act
MessageWe understand the Phalangists position and thank them for their clarification on the position of their party with regard to this bill.

Date07:52:08, November 21, 2009 CET
From Optimate Party
ToDebating the Environment Protection Act
MessageWith some reservations, yes, we would support the passage of a similar bill if the registration of domesticated animals was removed.

We believe that it is important to preserve such animals so that our citizens may continue to enjoy the marvels of such creatures in controlled exhibitions.

Date05:20:24, November 22, 2009 CET
From Pnték Lofrkadé Nrzi Prta
ToDebating the Environment Protection Act
MessageWhile the leader of the PPDP supports with the proposed legislation, the party votes in accordance with the vote its Members of Parliament hold. As the outcome of the party vote was Against, the party's stance will be Against the legislation.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 339

no
     

Total Seats: 411

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Players using inactive accounts and/or accounts from outside nations may only propose bills and/or contribute to discussions, whether IC (in-character) or OOC (out-of-character) with the general consent of the players in the nation.

    Random quote: "Oh, judge, your damn laws: the good people don't need them and the bad people don't follow them so what good are they?" - Ammon Hennacy

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 72