Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5461
Next month in: 00:08:16
Server time: 19:51:43, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): Caoimhean | SocDemDundorfian | wstodden2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Parliament Act 2854

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal Democratic Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2855

Description[?]:

The 'senate' generally refers to the upper house in the bicameral legislature of a nation or state. I think it is misleading to have this term to refer to our legislative system as we have a single parliament. Therefore, parliament is a much more fitting term. Furthermore, MP (Member of Parliament) is a more desirable term for our representatives.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:14:09, November 26, 2009 CET
From United Democrats
ToDebating the Parliament Act 2854
MessageI completely agree.

Date20:19:22, November 26, 2009 CET
From People's Party of Rutania
ToDebating the Parliament Act 2854
MessageThis makes sense as the current name is misleading.

Date20:53:57, November 26, 2009 CET
From First Marine Party
ToDebating the Parliament Act 2854
Messagefair enough

Date19:46:36, November 27, 2009 CET
From Rutanian Restoration Party
ToDebating the Parliament Act 2854
MessageWe can support. Would the LDP consider Federal Parliament?

Date00:20:02, November 28, 2009 CET
From Rutanian Heritage Party
ToDebating the Parliament Act 2854
MessageWe can support this.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 315

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
      

    Total Seats: 185


    Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

    Random quote: "The government was set to protect man from criminals, and the Constitution was written to protect man from the government." - Ayn Rand

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 63