Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5471
Next month in: 03:02:26
Server time: 04:57:33, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): shemi64 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Environment and Agriculture Renewal Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberaldemokratische Allianz

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2855

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date05:32:33, November 28, 2009 CET
FromKonstitutionelle Monarchie Partei
ToDebating the Environment and Agriculture Renewal Act
MessageThe Christian Liberals are proposing here like they have in the Infrastructure bill to take power away from local governments. Farm size; perhaps some local governments do not want massive farms, perhaps some due, thus the current policy. As for the Forest Management article, the proposed policy would break up the Crownland Forestry Agencies which are governed by regional and local governments, which we are against.

Date05:50:34, November 28, 2009 CET
FromLiberaldemokratische Allianz
ToDebating the Environment and Agriculture Renewal Act
MessageWe are bringing power back to consumers, the market, and farmers themselves. They are in the best position to judge whether or not the size of their farm is economically viable or sustainable. Let the farmer decide his acreage, not the bureaucrat. Let the consumer and market reap the benefits of agriculture done through economies of scale instead of higher prices because of inefficient size regulations.

This proposal would in no way break up the Crownland Forestry Agencies. It allows crownlands the choice to continue to operate the agencies as direct managers of forest land or not. If the Landtag of a crownland does not want their CFA to manage forest land the Agency still is responsible for other policy areas. Local governments are still responsible for tree plantation policy and forest protection. This law will not change that. The FAP's argument is unfounded.

Date12:37:38, November 28, 2009 CET
FromChristliche Zentrumspartei (CDV)
ToDebating the Environment and Agriculture Renewal Act
MessageHr. Dr. August Herzwasser - CZP Environment Spokesman

In accordance with our principle of rentsmanship and spread responsibility, we fullheartedly support the efforts of our friends the Christian Liberals.We have been given this Terra by God to care for, and why can't we do that on a very local, that is, individual level? We trust in the responsibility of our citizens, where other parties do not.

Congratulations to our colleagues.

Date14:13:31, November 28, 2009 CET
FromVerfassungs Unabhängigkeit Partei
ToDebating the Environment and Agriculture Renewal Act
MessageThe VP supports this motion, the consumer should have the right to choose whatever or not he can sustain larger crops.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 538

no
 

Total Seats: 187

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: "Spamming", or the indiscriminate posting of unsolicited messages, is not allowed.

    Random quote: "If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared." - Niccolo Machiavelli

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 65